178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36862967)
1. Cost-Effectiveness of Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Single-Gene Testing for the Molecular Diagnosis of Patients With Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Perspective of Spanish Reference Centers.
Arriola E; Bernabé R; Campelo RG; Biscuola M; Enguita AB; López-Ríos F; Martínez R; Mezquita L; Palanca S; Pareja MJ; Zugazagoitia J; Arrabal N; García JF; Carcedo D; de Álava E
JCO Precis Oncol; 2023 Mar; 7():e2200546. PubMed ID: 36862967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of molecular diagnosis by next-generation sequencing versus sequential single testing in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients from a south Spanish hospital perspective.
de Alava E; Pareja MJ; Carcedo D; Arrabal N; García JF; Bernabé-Caro R
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2022 Sep; 22(6):1033-1042. PubMed ID: 35593180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Value and Cost-Effectiveness of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Testing for Treatment of Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
Zou D; Ye W; Hess LM; Bhandari NR; Ale-Ali A; Foster J; Quon P; Harris M
J Mol Diagn; 2022 Aug; 24(8):901-914. PubMed ID: 35688357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost-effectiveness of including liquid biopsy into molecular profiling strategies for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in an Asian population.
Liu S; Graves N; Tan AC
Lung Cancer; 2024 May; 191():107794. PubMed ID: 38636314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and economic impact of 'ROS1-testing' strategy compared to a 'no-ROS1-testing' strategy in advanced NSCLC in Spain.
Rojo F; Conde E; Torres H; Cabezón-Gutiérrez L; Bautista D; Ramos I; Carcedo D; Arrabal N; García JF; Galán R; Nadal E
BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):292. PubMed ID: 35303812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and economic impact of current ALK rearrangement testing in Spain compared with a hypothetical no-testing scenario.
Nadal E; Bautista D; Cabezón-Gutiérrez L; Ortega AL; Torres H; Carcedo D; Ruiz de Alda L; Garcia JF; Vieitez P; Rojo F
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):689. PubMed ID: 34112097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of next-generation sequencing for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based registry study.
Kang DW; Park SK; Yu YL; Lee Y; Lee DH; Kang S
ESMO Open; 2024 Jan; 9(1):102200. PubMed ID: 38194884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling Costs and Life-Years Gained by Population-Wide Next-Generation Sequencing or Single-Gene Testing in Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
Lemmon CA; Zhou J; Hobbs B; Pennell NA
JCO Precis Oncol; 2023 Jan; 7():e2200294. PubMed ID: 36634300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of incorporating next-generation sequencing (NGS) in an Asian non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population: Incremental yield of actionable alterations and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Tan AC; Lai GGY; Tan GS; Poon SY; Doble B; Lim TH; Aung ZW; Takano A; Tan WL; Ang MK; Tan BS; Devanand A; Too CW; Gogna A; Ong BH; Koh TPT; Kanesvaran R; Ng QS; Jain A; Rajasekaran T; Lim AST; Lim WT; Toh CK; Tan EH; Lim TKH; Tan DSW
Lung Cancer; 2020 Jan; 139():207-215. PubMed ID: 31835042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness of Parallel Versus Sequential Testing of Genetic Aberrations for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands.
Wolff HB; Steeghs EMP; Mfumbilwa ZA; Groen HJM; Adang EM; Willems SM; Grünberg K; Schuuring E; Ligtenberg MJL; Tops BBJ; Coupé VMH
JCO Precis Oncol; 2022 Jul; 6():e2200201. PubMed ID: 35834758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) mutation testing in adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Joore M; Whiting P; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Armstrong N; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 May; 18(32):1-166. PubMed ID: 24827857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care in the treatment of patients with resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and overexpression of PD-L1.
Escudero-Vilaplana V; Collado-Borrell R; De Castro J; Insa A; Martínez A; Fernández E; Sullivan I; Flores A; Arrabal N; Carcedo D; Manzaneque A
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):445-453. PubMed ID: 36883193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness analysis of afatinib versus pemetrexed-cisplatin for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer from the Singapore healthcare payer's perspective.
Tan PT; Aziz MIA; Pearce F; Lim WT; Wu DB; Ng K
BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):352. PubMed ID: 29587666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic and economic value of biomarker testing for targetable mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: a literature review.
Zheng Y; Vioix H; Liu FX; Singh B; Sharma S; Sharda D
Future Oncol; 2022 Feb; 18(4):505-518. PubMed ID: 34865516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy Versus No Consolidation Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Grossi F; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 May; 42(5):830-847. PubMed ID: 32354495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cell-Free Circulating Tumour DNA Blood Testing to Detect
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(5):1-176. PubMed ID: 32206157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost of genetic testing, delayed care, and suboptimal treatment associated with polymerase chain reaction versus next-generation sequencing biomarker testing for genomic alterations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Bestvina CM; Waters D; Morrison L; Emond B; Lafeuille MH; Hilts A; Lefebvre P; He A; Vanderpoel J
J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):292-303. PubMed ID: 38391239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supporting Biomarker-Driven Therapies in Oncology: A Genomic Testing Cost Calculator.
Stenzinger A; Cuffel B; Paracha N; Vail E; Garcia-Foncillas J; Goodman C; Lassen U; Vassal G; Sullivan SD
Oncologist; 2023 May; 28(5):e242-e253. PubMed ID: 36961477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of osimertinib in the UK for advanced EGFR-T790M non-small cell lung cancer.
Bertranou E; Bodnar C; Dansk V; Greystoke A; Large S; Dyer M
J Med Econ; 2018 Feb; 21(2):113-121. PubMed ID: 28880737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
