These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36863172)

  • 1. Examining the role of attentional allocation in working memory precision with pupillometry in children and adults.
    Galeano-Keiner EM; Pakzad S; Brod G; Bunge SA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Jul; 231():105655. PubMed ID: 36863172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):757-65. PubMed ID: 25324180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupillometry tracks fluctuations in working memory performance.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 30411207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fine-grained versus categorical: Pupil size differentiates between strategies for spatial working memory performance.
    Starc M; Anticevic A; Repovš G
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):724-735. PubMed ID: 28127779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ocular working memory signals are flexible to behavioral priority and subjective imagery strength.
    Dong Y; Kiyonaga A
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Jul; 132(1):162-176. PubMed ID: 38836298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):461-484. PubMed ID: 29204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of attentional biases on multiple working memory precision parameters for children and adults.
    Shimi A; Scerif G
    Dev Sci; 2022 May; 25(3):e13213. PubMed ID: 34897919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revealing visual working memory operations with pupillometry: Encoding, maintenance, and prioritization.
    Koevoet D; Strauch C; Van der Stigchel S; Mathôt S; Naber M
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2024; 15(2):e1668. PubMed ID: 37933423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights into visual working memory precision at the feature- and object-level from a hemispheric encoding manipulation.
    Galeano Weber EM; Keglovits H; Fisher A; Bunge SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):1949-1968. PubMed ID: 32484392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focused attention predicts visual working memory performance in 13-month-old infants: A pupillometric study.
    Cheng C; Kaldy Z; Blaser E
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 36():100616. PubMed ID: 30769261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distributed patterns of occipito-parietal functional connectivity predict the precision of visual working memory.
    Galeano Weber EM; Hahn T; Hilger K; Fiebach CJ
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():404-418. PubMed ID: 27721028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential aspects of attention predict the depth of visual working memory encoding: Evidence from pupillometry.
    Koevoet D; Naber M; Strauch C; Somai RS; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2023 Jun; 23(6):9. PubMed ID: 37318440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance.
    Robison MK; Garner LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 38326632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in attention at encoding: Insights from pupillometry and eye gaze fixations.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2277-2294. PubMed ID: 31750720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foggy windows: Pupillary responses during task preparation.
    Trani A; Verhaeghen P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2235-2248. PubMed ID: 30226439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patience is a virtue: Individual differences in cue-evoked pupil responses under temporal certainty.
    Hood AVB; Hart KM; Marchak FM; Hutchison KA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1286-1303. PubMed ID: 35396616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Costs of storing colour and complex shape in visual working memory: Insights from pupil size and slow waves.
    Kursawe MA; Zimmer HD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():67-77. PubMed ID: 25939139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral and Neural Markers of Flexible Attention over Working Memory in Aging.
    Mok RM; Myers NE; Wallis G; Nobre AC
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1831-42. PubMed ID: 26865653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How the size of the to-be-learned material influences the encoding and later retrieval of associative memories: A pupillometric assessment.
    Pajkossy P; Racsmány M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226684. PubMed ID: 31891588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.