These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36863172)

  • 21. The pupillary light response reflects encoding, but not maintenance, in visual working memory.
    Blom T; Mathôt S; Olivers CN; Van der Stigchel S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1716-1723. PubMed ID: 27428779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When flanker meets the n-back: What EEG and pupil dilation data reveal about the interplay between the two central-executive working memory functions inhibition and updating.
    Scharinger C; Soutschek A; Schubert T; Gerjets P
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Oct; 52(10):1293-304. PubMed ID: 26238380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural Correlates Underlying the Precision of Visual Working Memory.
    Zhao Y; Kuai S; Zanto TP; Ku Y
    Neuroscience; 2020 Jan; 425():301-311. PubMed ID: 31812661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory.
    Keene PA; deBettencourt MT; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482. PubMed ID: 36138300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Processing speed, but not working memory or global cognition, is associated with pupil diameter during fixation.
    Coors A; Breteler MMB; Ettinger U
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14089. PubMed ID: 35521807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus.
    Alnæs D; Sneve MH; Espeseth T; Endestad T; van de Pavert SH; Laeng B
    J Vis; 2014 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 24692319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.
    Dowd EW; Pearson JM; Egner T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 28155212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus-driven attention and cognitive control during encoding: An event related brain potentials study.
    Wills-Conn K; Schroder H; Moser J; Ravizza S
    Biol Psychol; 2019 May; 144():1-10. PubMed ID: 30858074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prefrontal activation and pupil dilation during n-back task performance: A combined fNIRS and pupillometry study.
    Yeung MK; Lee TL; Han YMY; Chan AS
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Aug; 159():107954. PubMed ID: 34252415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Parietal-Occipital Interactions Underlying Control- and Representation-Related Processes in Working Memory for Nonspatial Visual Features.
    Gosseries O; Yu Q; LaRocque JJ; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Cowan N; Postle BR
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4357-4366. PubMed ID: 29636395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prioritizing flexible working memory representations through retrospective attentional strengthening.
    Li D; Hu Y; Qi M; Zhao C; Jensen O; Huang J; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2023 Apr; 269():119902. PubMed ID: 36708973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Working memory recall precision is a more sensitive index than span.
    Zokaei N; Burnett Heyes S; Gorgoraptis N; Budhdeo S; Husain M
    J Neuropsychol; 2015 Sep; 9(2):319-29. PubMed ID: 25208525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance.
    Wildegger T; Humphreys G; Nobre AC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164174. PubMed ID: 27706240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex enhances distinct aspects of visual working memory.
    Heinen K; Sagliano L; Candini M; Husain M; Cappelletti M; Zokaei N
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():35-42. PubMed ID: 27143222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.
    LaRocque JJ; Riggall AC; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4881-4890. PubMed ID: 27702811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pupillometry tracks cognitive load and salience network activity in a working memory functional magnetic resonance imaging task.
    Fietz J; Pöhlchen D; Binder FP; ; Czisch M; Sämann PG; Spoormaker VI
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Feb; 43(2):665-680. PubMed ID: 34622518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicted utility modulates working memory fidelity in the brain.
    Levin EJ; Brissenden JA; Fengler A; Badre D
    Cortex; 2023 Mar; 160():115-133. PubMed ID: 36841093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.