BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36866068)

  • 1. Multidimensional Forced-Choice CAT With Dominance Items: An Empirical Comparison With Optimal Static Testing Under Different Desirability Matching.
    Lin Y; Brown A; Williams P
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):322-350. PubMed ID: 36866068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.
    Wang Q; Zheng Y; Liu K; Cai Y; Peng S; Tu D
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):600-614. PubMed ID: 36750522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.
    Kreitchmann RS; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):294-321. PubMed ID: 36866066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):761-772. PubMed ID: 31342469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks.
    Paap MCS; Born S; Braeken J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):68-83. PubMed ID: 30573935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing countdown- and IRT-based approaches to computerized adaptive personality testing.
    Rudick MM; Yam WH; Simms LJ
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):769-79. PubMed ID: 23647045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model.
    Bunji K; Okada K
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1091-1107. PubMed ID: 32394181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contributions to Constructing Forced-Choice Questionnaires Using the Thurstonian IRT Model.
    Sun L; Qin Z; Wang S; Tian X; Luo F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(2):229-250. PubMed ID: 37776890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Ipsative Tests with Multidimensional Pairwise-Comparison Items: Algorithm Development and Applications.
    Qiu XL; de la Torre J; Ro S; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 46(4):255-272. PubMed ID: 35601264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
    Lee H; Smith WZ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
    Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Constrained Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Su YH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jul; 40(5):346-360. PubMed ID: 29881058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Context on Item Parameters in Forced-Choice Personality Assessments.
    Lin Y; Brown A
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 77(3):389-414. PubMed ID: 29795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
    Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
    Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procedures to Develop a Computerized Adaptive Testing to Advance the Measurement of Narcissistic Personality.
    Luo H; Cai Y; Tu D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1437. PubMed ID: 32714251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized adaptive testing with decision regression trees: an alternative to item response theory for quality of life measurement in multiple sclerosis.
    Michel P; Baumstarck K; Loundou A; Ghattas B; Auquier P; Boyer L
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2018; 12():1043-1053. PubMed ID: 29950817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of Computerized Adaptive Testing for Emotion Regulation.
    Xu L; Jin R; Huang F; Zhou Y; Li Z; Zhang M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():561358. PubMed ID: 33335495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating and Using Block Information in the Thurstonian IRT Model.
    Frick S
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1556-1589. PubMed ID: 37640828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.