These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36866068)

  • 21. Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.
    Nie L; Xu P; Hu D
    Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26884. PubMed ID: 38449643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimating and Using Block Information in the Thurstonian IRT Model.
    Frick S
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1556-1589. PubMed ID: 37640828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact.
    Ware JE; Kosinski M; Bjorner JB; Bayliss MS; Batenhorst A; Dahlöf CG; Tepper S; Dowson A
    Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):935-52. PubMed ID: 14651413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.
    Guenole N; Brown AA; Cooper AJ
    Assessment; 2018 Jun; 25(4):513-526. PubMed ID: 27056730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.
    Ng V; Lee P; Ho MR; Kuykendall L; Stark S; Tay L
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):224-237. PubMed ID: 32208939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
    Brown A
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Content-balancing strategy in bifactor computerized adaptive patient-reported outcome measurement.
    Zheng Y; Chang CH; Chang HH
    Qual Life Res; 2013 Apr; 22(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 22538634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combining Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Item Response Theory.
    Luo H; Wang D; Guo Z; Cai Y; Tu D
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 46(4):288-302. PubMed ID: 35601262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model.
    Walton KE; Cherkasova L; Roberts RD
    Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 31007043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.
    Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V; Nieto MD; Morillo D
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2309. PubMed ID: 31681103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multidimensional CAT Item Selection Methods for Domain Scores and Composite Scores: Theory and Applications.
    Yao L
    Psychometrika; 2012 Jul; 77(3):495-523. PubMed ID: 27519778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.
    Xiao Y; Liu H; Li H
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():806. PubMed ID: 28572781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for longitudinal monitoring of depression, anxiety, and stress reactions.
    Devine J; Fliege H; Kocalevent R; Mierke A; Klapp BF; Rose M
    J Affect Disord; 2016 Jan; 190():846-853. PubMed ID: 25481813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement Precision and Efficiency of Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in People With Stroke.
    Seamon BA; Kautz SA; Velozo CA
    Phys Ther; 2021 Apr; 101(4):. PubMed ID: 33481989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computerized Adaptive Testing Provides Reliable and Efficient Depression Measurement Using the CES-D Scale.
    Loe BS; Stillwell D; Gibbons C
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Sep; 19(9):e302. PubMed ID: 28931496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive test (CAT) measurement of pain.
    Petersen MA; Aaronson NK; Chie WC; Conroy T; Costantini A; Hammerlid E; Hjermstad MJ; Kaasa S; Loge JH; Velikova G; Young T; Groenvold M
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jan; 25(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26267524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Applying Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): A Simulation Study.
    Magnée T; de Beurs DP; Terluin B; Verhaak PF
    JMIR Ment Health; 2017 Feb; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 28223264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing.
    Han KCT
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():7. PubMed ID: 29575849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
    Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory.
    Dueber DM; Love AMA; Toland MD; Turner TA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Feb; 79(1):108-128. PubMed ID: 30636784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.