These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36867946)

  • 1. The spatiotemporal gradient of intrusion errors in continuous outcome source memory: Source retrieval is affected by both guessing and intrusions.
    Zhou J; Osth AF; Smith PL
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Mar; 141():101552. PubMed ID: 36867946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verbal intrusions precede memory decline in adults with Down syndrome.
    Kittler P; Krinsky-McHale SJ; Devenny DA
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jan; 50(Pt 1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16316425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Swap errors in visual working memory are fully explained by cue-feature variability.
    McMaster JMV; Tomić I; Schneegans S; Bays PM
    Cogn Psychol; 2022 Sep; 137():101493. PubMed ID: 35777189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A circular diffusion model of continuous-outcome source memory retrieval: Contrasting continuous and threshold accounts.
    Zhou J; Osth AF; Lilburn SD; Smith PL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1112-1130. PubMed ID: 33501594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):899-905. PubMed ID: 22688538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in incorrect responding and the ability to discriminate the source of the products of retrieval.
    Jonker TR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1078-89. PubMed ID: 26727125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New Intrusion Analyses on the CVLT-3: Utility in Distinguishing the Memory Disorders of Alzheimer's
    Graves LV; Holden HM; Van Etten EJ; Delano-Wood L; Bondi MW; Salmon DP; Corey-Bloom J; Gilbert PE; Delis DC
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Sep; 25(8):878-883. PubMed ID: 31060638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory resources recover gradually over time: The effects of word frequency, presentation rate, and list composition on binding errors and mnemonic precision in source memory.
    Popov V; So M; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1263-1280. PubMed ID: 34672661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Source accuracy data reveal the thresholded nature of human episodic memory.
    Harlow IM; Donaldson DI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 23192370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrusions in episodic memory: reconsolidation or interference?
    Klingmüller A; Caplan JB; Sommer T
    Learn Mem; 2017 May; 24(5):216-224. PubMed ID: 28416633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guessing versus misremembering in recognition: A comparison of continuous, two-high-threshold, and low-threshold models.
    Starns JJ; Ma Q
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 28933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remaking memories: reconsolidation updates positively motivated spatial memory in rats.
    Jones B; Bukoski E; Nadel L; Fellous JM
    Learn Mem; 2012 Feb; 19(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 22345494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparation breeds success: Brain activity predicts remembering.
    Herron JE; Evans LH
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():1-11. PubMed ID: 29860188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Item-specific encoding produces an additional benefit of directed forgetting: evidence from intrusion errors.
    Sahakyan L; Delaney PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1346-54. PubMed ID: 20804302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decline in working memory updating through ageing: intrusion error analyses.
    De Beni R; Palladino P
    Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 15098622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The diminishing precision of memory for time.
    Scofield JE; Johnson JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):212-219. PubMed ID: 34357547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the role of context on the existing evidence for reconsolidation of episodic memory.
    Capelo AM; Albuquerque PB; Cadavid S
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):280-294. PubMed ID: 30084743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.