These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36867946)

  • 21. Exploring the role of context on the existing evidence for reconsolidation of episodic memory.
    Capelo AM; Albuquerque PB; Cadavid S
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):280-294. PubMed ID: 30084743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall.
    Zaromb FM; Howard MW; Dolan ED; Sirotin YB; Tully M; Wingfield A; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):792-804. PubMed ID: 16822147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contextual representations of negative images modulate intrusion frequency in an intrusion provocation paradigm.
    Krans J; Pearson DG; Maier B; Moulds ML
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Dec; 53():52-8. PubMed ID: 26424087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.
    Makovski T; Pertzov Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1735-43. PubMed ID: 25980784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hallucinations and two types of free-recall intrusion in schizophrenia.
    Brébion G; David AS; Bressan RA; Ohlsen RI; Pilowsky LS
    Psychol Med; 2009 Jun; 39(6):917-26. PubMed ID: 19079808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Analysis of intrusion errors in free recall].
    Diesfeldt HFA
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2017 Jun; 48(3):134-144. PubMed ID: 28500488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. State-dependent effects of alcohol on recollective experience, familiarity and awareness of memories.
    Duka T; Weissenborn R; Dienes Z
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Jan; 153(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 11271401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The functional locus of intrusions: encoding or retrieval?
    Dalla Barba G; Mantovan MC; Traykov L; Rieu D; Laurent A; Ermani M; Devouche E
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 24(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12187446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When items 'pop into mind': variability in temporal-context reinstatement in free-recall.
    Sadeh T; Moran R; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 25341746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The neural mechanism underlying recollection is sensitive to the quality of episodic memory: Event related potentials reveal a some-or-none threshold.
    Murray JG; Howie CA; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():298-308. PubMed ID: 26143201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling intrusions and correct recall in episodic memory: adult age differences in encoding of list context.
    Kliegl R; Lindenberger U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):617-37. PubMed ID: 8501432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.
    Wahlheim CN; Huff MJ
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):768-80. PubMed ID: 26322551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The importance of context: evidence that contextual representations increase intrusive memories.
    Pearson DG; Ross FD; Webster VL
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2012 Mar; 43(1):573-80. PubMed ID: 21867664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate.
    Potter KW; Huszar LD; Huber DE
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():26-45. PubMed ID: 29715583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model.
    Sederberg PB; Gershman SJ; Polyn SM; Norman KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 21512839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The associative structure of memory for multi-element events.
    Horner AJ; Burgess N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1370-83. PubMed ID: 23915127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.