These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36868296)

  • 21. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Object-based encoding in visual working memory: a life span study.
    Zhang Q; Shen M; Tang N; Zhao G; Gao Z
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 23962736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Task Demands Differentially Affect Processing of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Object Features in Working Memory.
    Kirmsse A; Zimmer HD; Ecker UKH
    Exp Psychol; 2022 Nov; 69(6):320-334. PubMed ID: 36809157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanisms of visual working memory processing task-irrelevant information retrieved from visual long-term memory.
    Sun Y; Wang L; Yu W; Yang X; Song J; Li S
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105871. PubMed ID: 38968784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object maintenance beyond their visible parts in working memory.
    Chen S; Töllner T; Müller HJ; Conci M
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jan; 119(1):347-355. PubMed ID: 29070629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Encoding of faces and objects into visual working memory: an event-related brain potential study.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):735-40. PubMed ID: 23921593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simultaneous estimation procedure reveals the object-based, but not space-based, dependence of visual working memory representations.
    Sone H; Kang MS; Li AY; Tsubomi H; Fukuda K
    Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104579. PubMed ID: 33406461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The extrastriate symmetry response is robust to variation in visual memory load.
    Derpsch Y; Rampone G; Piovesan A; Bertamini M; Makin ADJ
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Dec; 58(12):e13941. PubMed ID: 34592790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input.
    Gayet S; Guggenmos M; Christophel TB; Haynes JD; Paffen CLE; Van der Stigchel S; Sterzer P
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(28):6638-6647. PubMed ID: 28592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learned reward association improves visual working memory.
    Gong M; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):841-56. PubMed ID: 24392741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gamma Oscillations Underlie the Maintenance of Feature-Specific Information and the Contents of Visual Working Memory.
    Honkanen R; Rouhinen S; Wang SH; Palva JM; Palva S
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Oct; 25(10):3788-801. PubMed ID: 25405942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retrospective attention enhances visual working memory in the young but not the old: an ERP study.
    Duarte A; Hearons P; Jiang Y; Delvin MC; Newsome RN; Verhaeghen P
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):465-76. PubMed ID: 23445536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Topological change induces an interference effect in visual working memory.
    Wei N; Zhou T; Zhuo Y; Chen L
    J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):4. PubMed ID: 34473199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatically binding relevant and irrelevant features in visual working memory.
    Zhao C; Li X; Failing M; Wang B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1552-1560. PubMed ID: 34609227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for a dissociation between working memory capacity and feature-based attention.
    Harris AM; Jacoby O; Remington RW; Becker SI; Mattingley JB
    Cortex; 2020 Aug; 129():158-174. PubMed ID: 32473402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.
    Tas AC; Luck SJ; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1121-1138. PubMed ID: 26854532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What does ipsilateral delay activity reflect? Inferences from slow potentials in a lateralized visual working memory task.
    Arend AM; Zimmer HD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):4048-56. PubMed ID: 21671741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selective visual processing across competition episodes: a theory of task-driven visual attention and working memory.
    Schneider WX
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 368(1628):20130060. PubMed ID: 24018722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptive allocation of human visual working memory capacity during statistical and categorical learning.
    Bates CJ; Lerch RA; Sims CR; Jacobs RA
    J Vis; 2019 Feb; 19(2):11. PubMed ID: 30802280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.