These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36868666)

  • 1. Consumer demand for partial driving automation and hands-free driving capability.
    Mueller AS; Cicchino JB; Calvanelli JV
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():371-383. PubMed ID: 36868666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation.
    Muslim H; Kiu Leung C; Itoh M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106719. PubMed ID: 35660872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.
    Ulahannan A; Cain R; Thompson S; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102969. PubMed ID: 31600714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driving performance at lateral system limits during partially automated driving.
    Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Neukum A; Wolter S; Steiger R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():147-162. PubMed ID: 28886450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
    Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving.
    Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speeding behavior while using adaptive cruise control and lane centering in free flow traffic.
    Monfort SS; Reagan IJ; Cicchino JB; Hu W; Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 35044286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical evasion maneuvers in automated driving.
    Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jan; 194():107362. PubMed ID: 37931430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Habits, attitudes, and expectations of regular users of partial driving automation systems.
    Mueller AS; Cicchino JB; Calvanelli JV
    J Safety Res; 2024 Feb; 88():125-134. PubMed ID: 38485355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who is performing the driving tasks after interventions? Investigating drivers' understanding of mode transition logic in automated vehicles.
    Kim S; Novakazi F; van Grondelle E; van Egmond R; Happee R
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Nov; 121():104369. PubMed ID: 39182395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.