These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36869990)
1. Ablation of CTI-dependent flutter using different ablation technologies: acute and long-term outcome from the LEONARDO study. Maglia G; Pentimalli F; Verlato R; Solimene F; Malacrida M; Aspromonte V; Bacino L; Turrini P; Infusino T; La Greca C; Perego GB; Papa AA; De Ruvo E; Zingarini G; Devecchi C; Scaglione M; Tomasi C; Pirrotta S; Stabile G J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Oct; 66(7):1749-1757. PubMed ID: 36869990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maximum voltage gradient technique for optimization of ablation for typical atrial flutter with zero-fluoroscopy approach. Deutsch K; Śledź J; Mazij M; Ludwik B; Labus M; Karbarz D; Pasicka B; Chrabąszcz M; Śledź A; Klank-Szafran M; Vitali-Sendoz L; Kameczura T; Śpikowski J; Stec P; Ujda M; Stec S Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jun; 96(25):e6939. PubMed ID: 28640075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to avoid unnecessary RF applications in cavo-tricuspid isthmus: common atrial flutter ablation using 8-mm-tip mini-electrode-equipped catheter. Bińkowski BJ; Kucejko T; Łagodziński A; Lubiński A J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 32103404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new methodology for atrial flutter ablation by direct visualization of cavotricuspid conduction with voltage gradient mapping: a comparison to standard techniques. Bailin SJ; Johnson WB; Jumrussirikul P; Sorentino D; West R Europace; 2013 Jul; 15(7):1013-8. PubMed ID: 23447574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized controlled trial of Amigo® robotically controlled versus manually controlled ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus using a contact force ablation catheter. Hoffmayer KS; Krainski F; Shah S; Hunter J; Alegre M; Hsu JC; Feld GK J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 51(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29435790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simplified differential pacing technique for the evaluation of bidirectional cavo-tricuspid isthmus block during ablation of typical atrial flutter. Katritsis DG; Chokesuwattanaskul R; Zografos T; Jame S; Paxinos G; Morady F J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 63(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33550494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Achieving bi-directional conduction block during catheter ablation is not enough to prevent recurrence of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependant atrial flutter: Role of subclinical conduction. Cls Di Nubila B; Divulwewa K; Tang ASL; Agarwal SC Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Apr; 46(4):292-299. PubMed ID: 36787131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between the P wave and local atrial electrogram in predicting conduction block during catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Yokokawa M; Sinno MC; Saeed M; Latchamsetty R; Ghanbari H; Crawford T; Jongnarangsin K; Cunnane R; Pelosi F; Bogun F; Chugh A; Morady F; Oral H J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Nov; 53(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 29749578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of acute inefficacy and the radiofrequency energy time required for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation. Pérez-Rodon J; Rodriguez-García J; Sarrias-Merce A; Rivas-Gandara N; Roca-Luque I; Francisco-Pascual J; Santos-Ortega A; Martín-Sánchez G; Ferreira-González I; Rodríguez-Palomares J; Evangelista-Masip A; García-Dorado D; Moya-Mitjans À J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 28265782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimized radiofrequency lesions through local impedance guidance for effective CTI ablation in right atrial flutter. Ducceschi V; Zingarini G; Nigro G; Brasca FMA; Malacrida M; Carbone A; Lavalle C; Maglia G; Infusino T; Aloia A; Nicolis D; Auricchio C; Uccello A; Notaristefano F; Rago A; Botto GL; Esposito L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 May; 45(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 35383979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact-force-guided vs. contact-force-blinded catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter: a prospective study. Venier S; Andrade JG; Khairy P; Mondésert B; Dyrda K; Rivard L; Guerra PG; Dubuc M; Thibault B; Talajic M; Roy D; Macle L Europace; 2017 Jun; 19(6):1043-1048. PubMed ID: 27377075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing the detection of bidirectional block across the flutter isthmus for patients with typical isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Mangat I; Tschopp DR; Yang Y; Cheng J; Keung EC; Scheinman MM Am J Cardiol; 2003 Mar; 91(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 12615260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of adenosine to shorten the post ablation waiting period for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Morales G; Darrat YH; Lellouche N; Kim SM; Butt M; Bidwell K; Lippert W; Ogunbayo G; Hamon D; Di Biase L; Natale A; Parrott K; Elayi CS J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 28(8):876-881. PubMed ID: 28429528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incremental pacing maneuver for atrial flutter recurrence reduction after ablation: Vallès: yield of incremental pacing after flutter ablation. Vallès E; Bazan V; Cainzos-Achirica M; Jáuregui ME; Benito B; Bruguera J; Martí-Almor J Int J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 177(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 25453409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus morphology in CRYO versus radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Saygi S; Bastani H; Drca N; Insulander P; Wredlert C; Schwieler J; Jensen-Urstad M Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Apr; 51(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 27826985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]