168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36870042)
21. Cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1113374. PubMed ID: 37182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing the Value of Cemiplimab for Adults With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Konidaris G; Paul E; Kuznik A; Keeping S; Chen CI; Sasane M; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Ruiz ES; Khushalani NI; Cope S
Value Health; 2021 Mar; 24(3):377-387. PubMed ID: 33641772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer Based on the KEYNOTE-181 Study.
Zhan M; Xu T; Zheng H; He Z
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():790225. PubMed ID: 35309225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, PD-L1+≥50% of tumor cells in France: A modeling study.
Plessala I; Cawston H; Cortes J; Ajjouri R; Le Lay K; Souquet PJ; Chouaid C
Lung Cancer; 2023 Oct; 184():107316. PubMed ID: 37562344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Ding D; Hu H; Liao M; Shi Y; She L; Yao L; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Huang J
Adv Ther; 2020 May; 37(5):2116-2126. PubMed ID: 32193809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced esophageal carcinoma in the United States.
Hu J; Ye Z; Xu Z; Hao Z; Wang Y
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():941738. PubMed ID: 36568792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer.
Tewari KS; Monk BJ; Vergote I; Miller A; de Melo AC; Kim HS; Kim YM; Lisyanskaya A; Samouëlian V; Lorusso D; Damian F; Chang CL; Gotovkin EA; Takahashi S; Ramone D; Pikiel J; Maćkowiak-Matejczyk B; Guerra Alía EM; Colombo N; Makarova Y; Rischin D; Lheureux S; Hasegawa K; Fujiwara K; Li J; Jamil S; Jankovic V; Chen CI; Seebach F; Weinreich DM; Yancopoulos GD; Lowy I; Mathias M; Fury MG; Oaknin A;
N Engl J Med; 2022 Feb; 386(6):544-555. PubMed ID: 35139273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels.
Weng X; Luo S; Lin S; Zhong L; Li M; Xin R; Huang P; Xu X
Oncol Res; 2020 Mar; 28(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 31610828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.
Tang YK; Xu Z; Ye ZM; Li SR; Zhou Q
Head Neck; 2024 Jan; 46(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 37846175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. First-Line Treatment With Atezolizumab Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Weng X; Huang X; Li H; Lin S; Rao X; Guo X; Huang P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 43(5):340-348. PubMed ID: 32028340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or More.
Zheng Z; Lin J; Zhu H; Cai H
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():893387. PubMed ID: 35774581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy versus cetuximab plus chemotherapy to treat recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An updated KEYNOTE-048 based cost-effectiveness analysis.
She L; Tian K; Han J; Zuo W; Wang Z; Zhang N
Oral Oncol; 2022 Jun; 129():105871. PubMed ID: 35483156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Lu T; Huang Y; Cai Z; Lin W; Chen X; Chen R; Hu Y
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1171302. PubMed ID: 37564176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
Polyzoi M; Sandhu H; Maervoet J; Yuan Y; Chaudhary MA; Varol N; Lee A; Dale P; Jones C; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):660-668. PubMed ID: 35658806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Liu X; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1054405. PubMed ID: 36923040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Serplulimab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Treatment of US and Chinese Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Inform Drug Pricing.
Shao T; Zhao M; Liang L; Tang W
BioDrugs; 2023 May; 37(3):421-432. PubMed ID: 36840914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wan X; Luo X; Tan C; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Peng L
Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(20):3526-3534. PubMed ID: 31287562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Garside R; Pitt M; Anderson R; Rogers G; Dyer M; Mealing S; Somerville M; Price A; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. PubMed ID: 17999840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
