These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36870162)
21. Shrinkage stress and cuspal deflection in MOD restorations: analytical solutions and design guidelines. Aregawi WA; Fok ASL Dent Mater; 2021 May; 37(5):783-795. PubMed ID: 33612308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of several fibre-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth. Akman S; Akman M; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 21219366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fatigue analysis of restored teeth longitudinally cracked under cyclic loading. Lin F; Ordinola-Zapata R; Ye N; Xu H; Fok ASL Dent Mater; 2022 Jan; 38(1):204-213. PubMed ID: 34949478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems. Taha DG; Abdel-Samad AA; Mahmoud SH Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(7):579-87. PubMed ID: 21716986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite. Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Bagheri R; Abu Holy A J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 25656772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture behaviour of MOD restorations reinforced by various fibre-reinforced techniques - An in vitro study. Sáry T; Garoushi S; Braunitzer G; Alleman D; Volom A; Fráter M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Oct; 98():348-356. PubMed ID: 31302584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite resin along with fibre insertion in different positions in vitro. Rahman H; Singh S; Chandra A; Chandra R; Tripathi S Aust Endod J; 2016 Aug; 42(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 26419210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study. Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. Santos MJ; Bezerra RB J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture behavior of root-amputated teeth at different amount of periodontal support - a preliminary in vitro study. Szabó B; Garoushi S; Braunitzer G; Szabó P B; Baráth Z; Fráter M BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):261. PubMed ID: 31775721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of depth of mesio-occlusodistal preparation and mechanical cycling on fracture resistance of restored premolars. Sábio S; de Moraes Melo Neto CL; Mondelli J; Atta MT Gen Dent; 2019; 67(2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 30875313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin. Khan SI; Anupama R; Deepalakshmi M; Kumar KS J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23534017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro fracture resistance of root-filled teeth using new-generation dentine bonding adhesives. Hürmüzlü F; Serper A; Siso SH; Er K Int Endod J; 2003 Nov; 36(11):770-3. PubMed ID: 14641441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations. Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of root-canal treated mandibular molars with intracoronal restorations: effect of thermocycling and mechanical loading. Hitz T; Ozcan M; Göhring TN J Adhes Dent; 2010 Aug; 12(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 20157655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Ilgenstein I; Zitzmann NU; Bühler J; Wegehaupt FJ; Attin T; Weiger R; Krastl G Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jun; 19(5):1021-8. PubMed ID: 25248949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]