These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36871444)
61. Multimodal sensing and intuitive steering assistance improve navigation and mobility for people with impaired vision. Slade P; Tambe A; Kochenderfer MJ Sci Robot; 2021 Oct; 6(59):eabg6594. PubMed ID: 34644159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Multiple Perspectives on the Adoption of SMART Technologies for Improving Care of Older People: Mixed Methods Study. Elavsky S; Knapova L; Janiš K; Cimler R; Kuhnova J; Cernicky T J Med Internet Res; 2024 Feb; 26():e45492. PubMed ID: 38324345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Evaluation of an Audio-haptic Sensory Substitution Device for Enhancing Spatial Awareness for the Visually Impaired. Hoffmann R; Spagnol S; Kristjánsson Á; Unnthorsson R Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Sep; 95(9):757-765. PubMed ID: 30153241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Wearable Virtual White Cane Network for navigating people with visual impairment. Gao Y; Chandrawanshi R; Nau AC; Tse ZT Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Sep; 229(9):681-8. PubMed ID: 26334037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting. Wu YH; Wrobel J; Cornuet M; Kerhervé H; Damnée S; Rigaud AS Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():801-11. PubMed ID: 24855349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The Differential Effect of First-Time Single-Point Cane Use between Healthy Young and Older Adults. Omana H; Madou E; Divine A; Wittich W; Hill KD; Johnson AM; Holmes JD; Hunter SW PM R; 2021 Dec; 13(12):1399-1409. PubMed ID: 33492743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Older adults' attitudes and preferences regarding a multifunctional wellness tool: A pilot study. Joe J; Chaudhuri S; Chung J; Thompson H; Demiris G Inform Health Soc Care; 2016; 41(2):143-58. PubMed ID: 25325513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The feasibility and acceptability of smart home technology using the Howz system for people with stroke. Rogerson L; Burr J; Tyson S Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):148-152. PubMed ID: 30663921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors. Galica J; Liu Z; Kain D; Merchant S; Booth C; Koven R; Brundage M; Haase KR Support Care Cancer; 2021 Jun; 29(6):3389-3398. PubMed ID: 33404813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Factors influencing utilization of cancer rehabilitation services among older breast cancer survivors in the USA: a qualitative study. Brick R; Lyons KD; Bender C; Eilers R; Ferguson R; Pergolotti M; Toto P; Skidmore E; Leland NE Support Care Cancer; 2022 Mar; 30(3):2397-2405. PubMed ID: 34766199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Patient and caregiver perceptions of lymphoma care and research opportunities: A qualitative study. Payne JB; Dance KV; Farone M; Phan A; Ho CD; Gutierrez M; Chen L; Flowers CR Cancer; 2019 Nov; 125(22):4096-4104. PubMed ID: 31355929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Improving survivorship care: Perspectives of cancer survivors 75 years and older. Fitch MI; Nicoll I; Lockwood G; Newton L; Strohschein FJ J Geriatr Oncol; 2021 Apr; 12(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 32962951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Self-Selection of Bathroom-Assistive Technology: Development of an Electronic Decision Support System (Hygiene 2.0). Guay M; Latulippe K; Auger C; Giroux D; Séguin-Tremblay N; Gauthier J; Genest C; Morales E; Vincent C J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e16175. PubMed ID: 32773380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The Expectations and Acceptability of a Smart Nursing Home Model Among Chinese Older Adults and Family Members: A Qualitative Study. Zhao Y; Sazlina SG; Rokhani FZ; Su J; Chew BH Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2023 Oct; 17(4):208-218. PubMed ID: 37661084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Monitoring mobility assistive device use in post-stroke patients. Boissy P; Hester T; Sherrill D; Corriveau H; Bonato P Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4372-5. PubMed ID: 18002972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Exploring the Potential of Technology to Promote Exercise Snacking for Older Adults Who Are Prefrail in the Home Setting: User-Centered Design Study. Stawarz K; Liang IJ; Alexander L; Carlin A; Wijekoon A; Western MJ JMIR Aging; 2023 May; 6():e41810. PubMed ID: 37223992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Breast cancer survivors' preferences for social support features in technology-supported physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods evaluation. Lloyd GR; Hoffman SA; Welch WA; Blanch-Hartigan D; Gavin KL; Cottrell A; Cadmus-Bertram L; Spring B; Penedo F; Courneya KS; Phillips SM Transl Behav Med; 2020 May; 10(2):423-434. PubMed ID: 30445595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Examining Usability, Acceptability, and Adoption of a Self-Directed, Technology-Based Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Cohort Study. Broderick M; O'Shea R; Burridge J; Demain S; Johnson L; Bentley P JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Aug; 10():e45993. PubMed ID: 37603405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. New horizons in managing older cancer survivors: complexities and opportunities. Mislang ARA; Mangoni AA; Molga A; Jena S; Koczwara B Age Ageing; 2023 Feb; 52(2):. PubMed ID: 36735848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]