BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36872417)

  • 1. Comparison of the effects of different rapid maxillary expansion techniques on craniofacial structures: a finite element analysis study.
    Kaya N; Seker ED; Yücesoy T
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Mar; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 36872417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance on the craniofacial structures using finite element analysis.
    Lee SC; Park JH; Bayome M; Kim KB; Araujo EA; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):638-48. PubMed ID: 24785928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparison of biomechanical effects of the conventional and bone-borne palatal expanders on late adolescence with unilateral cleft palate: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Meng WY; Ma YQ; Shi B; Liu RK; Wang XM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):600. PubMed ID: 36514035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of different palatal expanders with miniscrews in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A non-linear finite element analysis.
    Koç O; Koç N; Jacob HB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(1):e2423195. PubMed ID: 38451569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stresses and Strains Analysis Using Different Palatal Expander Appliances in Upper Jaw and Midpalatal Suture.
    Carvalho Trojan L; Andrés González-Torres L; Claudia Moreira Melo A; Barbosa de Las Casas E
    Artif Organs; 2017 Jun; 41(6):E41-E51. PubMed ID: 27925236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 3 different bone-borne type expansion appliances used in surgically-assisted rapid palatal expansion: A finite element analysis.
    Koç O; Pamukçu H; Kocabalkan AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Mar; 163(3):e23-e33. PubMed ID: 36572581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of tooth-borne and hybrid devices in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: A randomized clinical cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Kayalar E; Schauseil M; Kuvat SV; Emekli U; Fıratlı S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 44(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 26782847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Protraction Using Diverse Modes of Rapid Palatal Expansion.
    Balakrishnan R; Sengottuvel N; Altaf SK; Bhandari PK; Kumaragurubaran P; Antony M
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36328. PubMed ID: 37077604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study.
    Singaraju GS; Chembeti D; Mandava P; Reddy VK; Shetty SK; George SA
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 7(9):40-6. PubMed ID: 26435615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of different distractor positions on the formation of expansion, stress and displacement patterns in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion without pterygomaxillary disjunction: a finite element analysis study.
    Koç O; Bolat Gumus E
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024; 27(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 36724781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison and evaluation of stresses generated by rapid maxillary expansion and the implant-supported rapid maxillary expansion on the craniofacial structures using finite element method of stress analysis.
    Jain V; Shyagali TR; Kambalyal P; Rajpara Y; Doshi J
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 28092094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two different designs of mini-screw assisted maxillary expanders, using FEM to analyse stress distribution in craniofacial structures and anchor teeth.
    Cozzani M; Nucci L; Lupini D; Tripodi D; Noori N; Hasani M; Jamilian A
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100607. PubMed ID: 35115235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation of three surgical techniques combined with two different bone-borne forces for surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion of the maxillofacial complex: a finite element analysis.
    Möhlhenrich SC; Modabber A; Kniha K; Peters F; Steiner T; Hölzle F; Fritz U; Raith S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 46(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28610819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Displacement and stress distribution by different bone-borne palatal expanders with facemask: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Park JH; Bayome M; Zahrowski JJ; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 28024761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex.
    Sygouros A; Motro M; Ugurlu F; Acar A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 25432256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stress distribution of surgically assisted tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion via three different types of osteotomies].
    Jiang WH; Wang XD; Wang DM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Dec; 18(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 20143023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Tooth- and Bone-Borne Appliances on the Stress Distributions and Displacement Patterns in the Facial Skeleton in Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion-A Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study.
    Nowak R; Olejnik A; Gerber H; Frątczak R; Zawiślak E
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 33804454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress distribution and displacement by different bone-borne palatal expanders with micro-implants: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Lee HK; Bayome M; Ahn CS; Kim SH; Kim KB; Mo SS; Kook YA
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 23148112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transverse, vertical, and anterior-posterior changes between tooth-anchored versus Dresden bone-anchored rapid maxillary expansion 6 months post-expansion: A CBCT randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Lagravère MO; Ling CP; Woo J; Harzer W; Major PW; Carey JP
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 32057733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of tooth-borne and bone-anchored expansion devices in SARME.
    Barone TR; Cahali MB; Vasconcelos C; Barone JR
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(2):181-187. PubMed ID: 32291547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.