These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36872861)
41. Dither: A unifying model of the effects of visitor numbers on zoo animal behavior. Krebs BL; Eschmann CL; Watters JV Zoo Biol; 2023 Mar; 42(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 36161730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Determinants of visitor pro-environmental intentions on two small Greek islands: is ecotourism possible at coastal protected areas? Kafyri A; Hovardas T; Poirazidis K Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 50(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 22538319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Zoo animals as "proxy species" for threatened sister taxa: Defining a novel form of species surrogacy. Kerr KCR Zoo Biol; 2021 Jan; 40(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 33043534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Unraveling the complexity of the zoo community: identifying the variables related to conservation performance in zoological parks. Fàbregas MC; Guillén-Salazar F; Garcés-Narro C Zoo Biol; 2012; 31(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 21480369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Widespread Behavioral Responses by Mammals and Fish to Zoo Visitors Highlight Differences between Individual Animals. Boyle SA; Berry N; Cayton J; Ferguson S; Gilgan A; Khan A; Lam H; Leavelle S; Mulder I; Myers R; Owens A; Park J; Siddiq I; Slevin M; Weidow T; Yu AJ; Reichling S Animals (Basel); 2020 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33203018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Visitors' effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review. Davey G J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2007; 10(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 17559323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Zoos through the lens of the IUCN Red List: a global metapopulation approach to support conservation breeding programs. Conde DA; Colchero F; Gusset M; Pearce-Kelly P; Byers O; Flesness N; Browne RK; Jones OR PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e80311. PubMed ID: 24348999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mission impossible or mission accomplished: Do zoo organizational missions influence conservation practices? Maynard L; Jacobson SK; Monroe MC; Savage A Zoo Biol; 2020 Sep; 39(5):304-314. PubMed ID: 32644286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluating the contribution of zoos and aquariums to Aichi Biodiversity Target 1. Moss A; Jensen E; Gusset M Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):537-44. PubMed ID: 25155574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo-based educational campaign: 'Don't Palm Us Off' for orang-utan conservation. Pearson EL; Lowry R; Dorrian J; Litchfield CA Zoo Biol; 2014; 33(3):184-96. PubMed ID: 24535962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Investigating the impact of large carcass feeding on the behavior of captive Andean condors (Vultur gryphus) and its perception by zoo visitors. Gaengler H; Clum N Zoo Biol; 2015; 34(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 25653198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of understanding of the amphibian crisis by zoo visitors across three countries. Dos Santos MM; Griffiths RA; Jowett T; Rock J; Bishop PJ Zoo Biol; 2019 Dec; 38(6):471-480. PubMed ID: 31602677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Limited contributions of released animals from zoos to North American conservation translocations. Brichieri-Colombi TA; Lloyd NA; McPherson JM; Moehrenschlager A Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 29923231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparing the effectiveness of flagship species in zoo interpretation videos involving dialogic-based narrative approaches. Bueddefeld J; Kerr KCR Zoo Biol; 2024; 43(5):435-446. PubMed ID: 38934616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Development and implementation of an evaluation strategy for measuring conservation outcomes. Wagner K; Chessler M; York P; Raynor J Zoo Biol; 2009 Sep; 28(5):473-87. PubMed ID: 19725124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantifying the impact of Wellington Zoo's persuasive communication campaign on post-visit behavior. MacDonald E Zoo Biol; 2015; 34(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25652807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impacts of visitor number on Kangaroos housed in free-range exhibits. Sherwen SL; Hemsworth PH; Butler KL; Fanson KV; Magrath MJ Zoo Biol; 2015; 34(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 26036594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review. Williams E; Hunton V; Hosey G; Ward SJ Animals (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37048434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Understanding impacts of zoo visitors: Quantifying behavioural changes of two popular zoo species during COVID-19 closures. Williams E; Carter A; Rendle J; Ward SJ Appl Anim Behav Sci; 2021 Mar; 236():105253. PubMed ID: 36540094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effects of visitor numbers on captive European red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) and impacts on visitor experience. Woolway EE; Goodenough AE Zoo Biol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 28221674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]