213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36873117)
21. Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.
Yang E; Jing S; Niu Y; Qi S; Yadav PK; Yang L; Bao J; Tian J; Wang J; Li N; Ou T; Wang Z
J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1773-1778. PubMed ID: 34375127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Initial Experience with the New Super Thin Single-use Pusen Flexible Ureteroscope 7.5 Fr in Renal Stones Endoscopic Treatment.
Geavlete B; Ene C; Iordache V; Geavlete P
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2021; 116(3):354-360. PubMed ID: 34191717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?
Ventimiglia E; Smyth N; Doizi S; Jiménez Godínez A; Barghouthy Y; Corrales Acosta MA; Kamkoum H; Somani B; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):251-256. PubMed ID: 34424373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of pre- and post-surgical images of reusable and single use flexible ureteroscopes: a qualitative analysis.
Domenech A; Alliende C; Vivaldi B; Pizzi P
Cent European J Urol; 2021; 74(3):459-463. PubMed ID: 34729238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.
Ventimiglia E; Godínez AJ; Traxer O; Somani BK
Turk J Urol; 2020 Nov; 46(Supp. 1):S40-S45. PubMed ID: 32877637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An in vitro Comparative Assessment of Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes Using a Standardized Ureteroscopy Training Model.
So WZ; Gauhar V; Chen K; Lu J; Chua WJ; Tiong HY
Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 35709703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective evaluation of flexible ureteroscopes with a novel evaluation tool.
Bell JR; Penniston KL; Best SL; Nakada SY
Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9004-9010. PubMed ID: 28971788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.
Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P
Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.
Somani BK; Al-Qahtani SM; de Medina SD; Traxer O
Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1017-9. PubMed ID: 24001703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The "no-touch" technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones.
Geavlete B; Cozma C; Geavlete P
J Med Life; 2021; 14(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 34621370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Single use flexible ureteroscopes: a review of current technologies and cost effectiveness analysis.
Talyshinskii A; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Knoll T; Shah K; Wan SP; Somani BK
Curr Opin Urol; 2024 Mar; 34(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 37962372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre.
Vaddi CM; Ramakrishna P; Ganesan S; Swamy S; Anandan H; Babu M
Cent European J Urol; 2022; 75(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 35937666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endoscopic treatment of lower pole stones: is a disposable ureteroscope preferable? Results of a prospective case-control study.
Salvadó JA; Cabello JM; Moreno S; Cabello R; Olivares R; Velasco A
Cent European J Urol; 2019; 72(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 31720031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscope Quality of Vision: An In Vitro Study.
Talso M; Proietti S; Emiliani E; Gallioli A; Dragos L; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Giusti G; Montanari E; Somani B; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):523-528. PubMed ID: 29562765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of laser fiber passage in ureteroscopic maximum deflection and their influence on deflection and irrigation: Do we really need the ball tip concept?
Baghdadi M; Emiliani E; Talso M; Servián P; Barreiro A; Orosa A; Proietti S; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):313-318. PubMed ID: 27300338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
