148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36873129)
1. Main factors determining the use of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps and comparing the results of breast reconstruction.
Smolanka II; Galych SP; Movchan OV; Bagmut IY; Sheremet MI; Kolisnyk IL; Bagmut OV; Lyashenko AO; Dosenko IV; Ivankova OM; Maksymyuk VV; Tarabanchuk VV
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):121-128. PubMed ID: 36873129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.
Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 10987463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The DIEP Flap as Method of Choice in Breast Reconstruction - Results and Protocol for Succesful Reconstruction].
Otte M; Andree C; Hagouan M; Richrath P; Abu-Ghazaleh A; Munder B
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2015 Aug; 47(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 26287324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps.
Baumann DP; Lin HY; Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 May; 125(5):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 20440154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.
Seidenstuecker K; Legler U; Munder B; Andree C; Mahajan A; Witzel C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 May; 69(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 27049776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Leaving the perfusion zones? Individualized flap design in 100 free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps for autologous breast reconstruction using indocyanine green angiography.
Ludolph I; Bettray D; Beier JP; Horch RE; Arkudas A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Jan; 75(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 34511387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wang XL; Liu LB; Song FM; Wang QY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative Blood Flow Analysis of DIEP vs. ms-TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction Combining Transit-Time Flowmetry and Microvascular Indocyanine Green Angiography.
Geierlehner A; Horch RE; Ludolph I; Arkudas A
J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Knight MA; Nguyen DT; Kobayashi MR; Evans GR
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jun; 56(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 16721068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
