205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36874324)
1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Comparison With Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Detection of the Etiology of Obstructive Jaundice.
Isram J; Haider E; Khan RSA; Hafeez M; Hinna RE; Baig I; Shahid A; Chaudhry M
Cureus; 2023 Feb; 15(2):e34484. PubMed ID: 36874324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of MRCP to determine the etiological spectrum, level and degree of biliary obstruction in obstructive jaundice.
Patel VB; Musa RK; Patel N; Patel SD
J Family Med Prim Care; 2022 Jul; 11(7):3436-3441. PubMed ID: 36387625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Versus the Gold Standard Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Detecting Common Bile Duct Stones.
Anwer M; Asghar MS; Rahman S; Kadir S; Yasmin F; Mohsin D; Jawed R; Memon GM; Rasheed U; Hassan M
Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12162. PubMed ID: 33489574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of common bile duct and pancreatic duct pathologies.
Kumar A; Mohanty NR; Mohanty M; Dash S
Front Med Technol; 2023; 5():946555. PubMed ID: 37521722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.
Polistina FA; Frego M; Bisello M; Manzi E; Vardanega A; Perin B
World J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 7(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25918584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.
Lomas DJ; Bearcroft PW; Gimson AE
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1411-7. PubMed ID: 10460385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) Evaluation of Obstructive Jaundice in Comparison with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Imam S; Islam MN; Khan NA; Mostafa SN; Amin MS; Rahman S; Akhter P
Mymensingh Med J; 2017 Apr; 26(2):420-425. PubMed ID: 28588181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Reliability of Ultrasound Compared to Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Detection of Obstructive Jaundice: A Retrospective Medical Records Review.
Alsaigh S; Aldhubayb MA; Alobaid AS; Alhajjaj AH; Alharbi BA; Alsudais DM; Alhothail HA; AlSaykhan MA
Cureus; 2020 Oct; 12(10):e10987. PubMed ID: 33209543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Case of Biliary Obstruction Comparing Post-operative Findings: A Study of 50 Cases.
Khan T; Alam SZ; Al Mamun M; Rahman MS; Islam MU; Bari S
Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 34605480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice.
Singh A; Mann HS; Thukral CL; Singh NR
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Mar; 8(3):103-7. PubMed ID: 24783094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT vs. MRCP in choledocholithiasis jaundice.
Petrescu I; Bratu AM; Petrescu S; Popa BV; Cristian D; Burcos T
J Med Life; 2015; 8(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 25866583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.
NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2002 Jan 14-16; 19(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 14768653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Evaluation of Obstructive Jaundice.
Karki S; Phuyal A; Paudel RC; Bhandari A; Dahal MR
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2021 Jan.-Mar; 19(73):35-40. PubMed ID: 34812155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kaltenthaler E; Vergel YB; Chilcott J; Thomas S; Blakeborough T; Walters SJ; Bouchier H
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Mar; 8(10):iii, 1-89. PubMed ID: 14982656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Biliary Obstruction.
Swaraj S; Mohapatra M; Sathpathy G; Yalamanchi R; Sen K; Menon SM; Madhesia A; Kumaraswamy SM; Radha Krishna K; Bobde DV
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33915. PubMed ID: 36819407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.
Griffin N; Wastle ML; Dunn WK; Ryder SD; Beckingham IJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
