These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36874840)

  • 1. Speech comprehension in noisy environments: Evidence from the predictability effects on the N400 and LPC.
    Hsin CH; Chao PC; Lee CY
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1105346. PubMed ID: 36874840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictability effect on N400 reflects the severity of reading comprehension deficits in aphasia.
    Chang CT; Lee CY; Chou CJ; Fuh JL; Wu HC
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():117-128. PubMed ID: 26686551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natural speech comprehension in bipolar disorders: an event-related brain potential study among manic patients.
    Cermolacce M; Faugère M; Micoulaud-Franchi JA; Belzeaux R; Maurel M; Naudin J; Azorin JM; Vion-Dury J
    J Affect Disord; 2014 Apr; 158():161-71. PubMed ID: 24655781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.
    Bhandari P; Demberg V; Kray J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714485. PubMed ID: 34566795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing changes when listening to foreign-accented speech.
    Romero-Rivas C; Martin CD; Costa A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():167. PubMed ID: 25859209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural modelling of the semantic predictability gain under challenging listening conditions.
    Rysop AU; Schmitt LM; Obleser J; Hartwigsen G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jan; 42(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 32959939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rational speech comprehension: Interaction between predictability, acoustic signal, and noise.
    Van Os M; Kray J; Demberg V
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():914239. PubMed ID: 36591096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Narrowed expectancies under degraded speech: revisiting the N400.
    Strauß A; Kotz SA; Obleser J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Aug; 25(8):1383-95. PubMed ID: 23489145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How and when predictability interacts with accentuation in temporally selective attention during speech comprehension.
    Li X; Lu Y; Zhao H
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():71-84. PubMed ID: 25250708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.
    Hunter CR
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 32282402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of middle age on the late positive component of the auditory event-related potential.
    Davis TM; Jerger J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24828220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interplay between acoustic/phonetic and semantic processes during spoken sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Boulenger V; Hoen M; Jacquier C; Meunier F
    Brain Lang; 2011 Feb; 116(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 20965558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical competition in nonnative speech comprehension.
    FitzPatrick I; Indefrey P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1165-78. PubMed ID: 19583470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age effects on cognitive functions and speech-in-noise processing: An event-related potential study with cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Burkhardt P; Müller V; Meister H; Weglage A; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1005859. PubMed ID: 36620447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.
    Zachau S; Korpilahti P; Hämäläinen JA; Ervast L; Heinänen K; Suominen K; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 59():57-73. PubMed ID: 24751994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences.
    Connolly JF; Stewart SH; Phillips NA
    Brain Lang; 1990 Aug; 39(2):302-18. PubMed ID: 2224497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory neural tracking and lexical processing of speech in noise: Masker type, spatial location, and language experience.
    Song J; Martin L; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):253. PubMed ID: 32752786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different neural processes underlie visual speech perception in school-age children and adults: An event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N; Ancel E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Aug; 184():98-122. PubMed ID: 31015101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech-brain phase coupling is enhanced in low contextual semantic predictability conditions.
    Molinaro N; Lizarazu M; Baldin V; Pérez-Navarro J; Lallier M; Ríos-López P
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jun; 156():107830. PubMed ID: 33771540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time course of contextual effects on visual word recognition.
    Lee CY; Liu YN; Tsai JL
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():285. PubMed ID: 22934087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.