These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36875292)

  • 1. Evaluating Equating Transformations in IRT Observed-Score and Kernel Equating Methods.
    Leôncio W; Wiberg M; Battauz M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Mar; 47(2):123-140. PubMed ID: 36875292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of IRT Observed Score Kernel Equating and Several Equating Methods.
    Wang S; Zhang M; You S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():308. PubMed ID: 32210877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency Analysis of Item Response Theory Kernel Equating for Mixed-Format Tests.
    Wallmark J; Josefsson M; Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):496-512. PubMed ID: 38027462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative Linear Item Response Theory Observed-Score Equating Methods.
    Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):180-199. PubMed ID: 29881047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating.
    Andersson B; Wiberg M
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 27743280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships Among Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Frameworks via Factor Analytic Models.
    Kohli N; Koran J; Henn L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):389-405. PubMed ID: 29795826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approximating Bifactor IRT True-Score Equating With a Projective Item Response Model.
    Kim KY; Cho UH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 32341608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item Response Theory True Score Equating for the Bifactor Model Under the Common-Item Nonequivalent Groups Design.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):479-493. PubMed ID: 35991829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients--a simulation study.
    Sébille V; Hardouin JB; Le Néel T; Kubis G; Boyer F; Guillemin F; Falissard B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Mar; 10():24. PubMed ID: 20338031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.
    Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Scoring Method Impact Estimation of Significant Individual Changes Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measures? Comparing Classical Test Theory Versus Item Response Theory.
    Tang X; Schalet BD; Peipert JD; Cella D
    Value Health; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1518-1524. PubMed ID: 37315768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining Potential Boundary Bias Effects in Kernel Smoothing on Equating: An Introduction for the Adaptive and Epanechnikov Kernels.
    Cid JA; von Davier AA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 May; 39(3):208-222. PubMed ID: 29881003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple-Structure Multidimensional Item Response Theory Equating for Multidimensional Tests.
    Kim SY; Lee WC; Kolen MJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Feb; 80(1):91-125. PubMed ID: 31933494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A primer on standardized testing:
    Himelfarb I
    J Chiropr Educ; 2019 Oct; 33(2):151-163. PubMed ID: 31169998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.
    Wolcott MD; Olsen AA; Augustine JM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 Sep; 14(9):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 36154966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative Evaluation of Kernel Equating and Test Characteristic Curve Equating.
    De Ayala RJ; Smith B; Norman Dvorak R
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Mar; 42(2):155-168. PubMed ID: 29881117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equating Errors and Scale Drift in Linked-Chain IRT Equating with Mixed-Format Tests.
    Hu B
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 29561741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.