These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36876696)

  • 1. Relationship between PET/CT images and KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer in Vietnamese patients.
    Dan NV; Phuong PC; Thai PV; Nguyen NH; Loi NT; Cong BT
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(4):1480-1486. PubMed ID: 36876696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of
    Oner AO; Budak ES; Yıldırım S; Aydın F; Sezer C
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 28697193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between
    Liu X; Wang SC; Ni M; Xie Q; Zhang YF; Lv WF; Geng GY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Apr; 47(4):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 35138462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship Between 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake and V-Ki-Ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog Mutation in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Variability Depending on C-Reactive Protein Level.
    Lee JH; Kang J; Baik SH; Lee KY; Lim BJ; Jeon TJ; Ryu YH; Sohn SK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jan; 95(1):e2236. PubMed ID: 26735530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Wu X; Huang Y; Li Y; Wang Q; Wang H; Jiang L
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Sep; 33(9):647-656. PubMed ID: 31165974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between KRAS mutation and
    Cho A; Jo K; Hwang SH; Lee N; Jung M; Yun M; Hwang HS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 28161825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume: surrogate image biomarkers of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer.
    Lv Y; Wang X; Liang L; Wang L; Lu J
    Onco Targets Ther; 2019; 12():2115-2121. PubMed ID: 30962693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value on SUV-derived parameters assessed on
    Liao X; Liu M; Li S; Huang W; Guo C; Liu J; Xiong Y; Zhang J; Fan Y; Wang R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37020286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between KRAS mutations and dual time point
    Mao W; Zhou J; Zhang H; Qiu L; Tan H; Hu Y; Shi H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jun; 44(6):2059-2066. PubMed ID: 30143816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans and KRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Kawada K; Toda K; Nakamoto Y; Iwamoto M; Hatano E; Chen F; Hasegawa S; Togashi K; Date H; Uemoto S; Sakai Y
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1322-7. PubMed ID: 26135109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters Measured by Pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
    Son SH; Kang SM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee SJ; Lee J; Ahn BC
    Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 41(6):e266-73. PubMed ID: 27055144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The correlation of
    Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT texture analysis for the prediction of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer via a machine learning approach.
    Taguchi N; Oda S; Yokota Y; Yamamura S; Imuta M; Tsuchigame T; Nagayama Y; Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Shiraishi S; Funama Y; Shinriki S; Miyamoto Y; Baba H; Yamashita Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():38-43. PubMed ID: 31439256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prognostic value of
    Grut H; Dueland S; Line PD; Revheim ME
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Feb; 45(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29026950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value on F18-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal nasal type NK/T cell lymphoma: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.
    Pak K; Kim BS; Kim K; Kim IJ; Jun S; Jeong YJ; Shim HK; Kim SD; Cho KS
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29056243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Volume-based parameters on FDG PET may predict the proliferative potential of soft-tissue sarcomas.
    Kitao T; Shiga T; Hirata K; Sekizawa M; Takei T; Yamashiro K; Tamaki N
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 30196378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Value of Volume-Based Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Parameters for Characterizing Thyroid Incidentaloma.
    Shi H; Yuan Z; Yuan Z; Yang C; Zhang J; Shou Y; Zhang W; Ping Z; Gao X; Liu S
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 29520193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
    Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer].
    Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
    Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
    Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.