120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36876696)
1. Relationship between PET/CT images and KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer in Vietnamese patients.
Dan NV; Phuong PC; Thai PV; Nguyen NH; Loi NT; Cong BT
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(4):1480-1486. PubMed ID: 36876696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of
Oner AO; Budak ES; Yıldırım S; Aydın F; Sezer C
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 28697193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between
Liu X; Wang SC; Ni M; Xie Q; Zhang YF; Lv WF; Geng GY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Apr; 47(4):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 35138462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship Between 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake and V-Ki-Ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog Mutation in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Variability Depending on C-Reactive Protein Level.
Lee JH; Kang J; Baik SH; Lee KY; Lim BJ; Jeon TJ; Ryu YH; Sohn SK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jan; 95(1):e2236. PubMed ID: 26735530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Wu X; Huang Y; Li Y; Wang Q; Wang H; Jiang L
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Sep; 33(9):647-656. PubMed ID: 31165974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between KRAS mutation and
Cho A; Jo K; Hwang SH; Lee N; Jung M; Yun M; Hwang HS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 28161825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume: surrogate image biomarkers of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer.
Lv Y; Wang X; Liang L; Wang L; Lu J
Onco Targets Ther; 2019; 12():2115-2121. PubMed ID: 30962693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value on SUV-derived parameters assessed on
Liao X; Liu M; Li S; Huang W; Guo C; Liu J; Xiong Y; Zhang J; Fan Y; Wang R
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37020286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between KRAS mutations and dual time point
Mao W; Zhou J; Zhang H; Qiu L; Tan H; Hu Y; Shi H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jun; 44(6):2059-2066. PubMed ID: 30143816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans and KRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Kawada K; Toda K; Nakamoto Y; Iwamoto M; Hatano E; Chen F; Hasegawa S; Togashi K; Date H; Uemoto S; Sakai Y
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1322-7. PubMed ID: 26135109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters Measured by Pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
Son SH; Kang SM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee SJ; Lee J; Ahn BC
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 41(6):e266-73. PubMed ID: 27055144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT texture analysis for the prediction of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer via a machine learning approach.
Taguchi N; Oda S; Yokota Y; Yamamura S; Imuta M; Tsuchigame T; Nagayama Y; Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Shiraishi S; Funama Y; Shinriki S; Miyamoto Y; Baba H; Yamashita Y
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():38-43. PubMed ID: 31439256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prognostic value of
Grut H; Dueland S; Line PD; Revheim ME
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Feb; 45(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29026950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value on F18-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal nasal type NK/T cell lymphoma: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Pak K; Kim BS; Kim K; Kim IJ; Jun S; Jeong YJ; Shim HK; Kim SD; Cho KS
Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29056243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volume-based parameters on FDG PET may predict the proliferative potential of soft-tissue sarcomas.
Kitao T; Shiga T; Hirata K; Sekizawa M; Takei T; Yamashiro K; Tamaki N
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 30196378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Value of Volume-Based Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Parameters for Characterizing Thyroid Incidentaloma.
Shi H; Yuan Z; Yuan Z; Yang C; Zhang J; Shou Y; Zhang W; Ping Z; Gao X; Liu S
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 29520193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer].
Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
