These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3687693)

  • 21. Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation wavefronts.
    Swartz JF; Jones JL; Jones RE; Fletcher R
    Circ Res; 1991 Feb; 68(2):438-49. PubMed ID: 1991348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of activation sequence on ventricular refractoriness as determined by extrastimuli.
    Linker NJ; Dancy M; Malik M; Jones S; Ward DE
    Cardiovasc Res; 1990 Aug; 24(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 2224933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The maximum effect of an increase in rate on human ventricular refractoriness.
    Morady F; Kadish AH; Toivonen LK; Kushner JA; Schmaltz S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Dec; 11(12):2223-34. PubMed ID: 2463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of the intertrain pause on the ventricular effective refractory period measured by the extrastimulus technique.
    Morady F; Kadish AH; Rosenheck S; Schmaltz S; Debuitleir M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 1692123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential effects of changes in local myocardial refractoriness on atrial and ventricular latency.
    Fananapazir L; Packer D; Prystowsky EN
    Circulation; 1996 Sep; 94(6):1364-71. PubMed ID: 8822994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of site of pacing on dispersion of refractoriness.
    Friehling TD; Kowey PR; Shechter JA; Engel TR
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 May; 55(11):1339-43. PubMed ID: 3993566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Human ventricular refractoriness: effects of increasing current.
    Greenspan AM; Camardo JS; Horowitz LN; Spielman SR; Josephson ME
    Am J Cardiol; 1981 Feb; 47(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 7468474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can potentially significant polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias initiated by programmed stimulation be distinguished from those that are nonspecific?
    Stevenson WG; Brugada P; Waldecker B; Zehender M; Wellens HJ
    Am Heart J; 1986 Jun; 111(6):1073-80. PubMed ID: 3716980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Programmed ventricular stimulation using tandem versus simple sequential protocols.
    Fisher JD; Kim SG; Ferrick KJ; Roth JA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Mar; 17(3 Pt 1):286-94. PubMed ID: 7513853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of ventricular refractory periods determined by incremental and decremental scanning of an extrastimulus.
    Morady F; Kadish AH; Kushner JA; Toivonen LK; Schmaltz S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Apr; 12(4 Pt 1):546-54. PubMed ID: 2470036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of selective stellate ganglion manipulation on ventricular refractoriness and excitability.
    García-Calvo R; Chorro FJ; Sendra M; Alberola A; Sanchis J; Navarro J; Valentín V; López-Merino V; Such L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1492-503. PubMed ID: 1383961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Refractoriness as a determinant of tachycardia inducibility in the right ventricle.
    Somberg JC; Schwartz J
    Am Heart J; 1987 Aug; 114(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 3604887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of high stimulation current on the induction of ventricular tachycardia.
    Morady F; Dicarlo LA; Liem LB; Krol RB; Baerman JM
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Jul; 56(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 4014043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changes in ventricular refractoriness after an extrastimulus: effects of prematurity, cycle length and procainamide.
    Cain ME; Martin TC; Marchlinski FE; Josephson ME
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 52(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 6637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The comparative effects of drive and test stimulus intensity on myocardial excitability and vulnerability.
    Friedman HS; Wattanasuwan N; Sharafkhaneh A; Win M; Mallipeddi D; Khan IA; Dai CP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 23(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 10666757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Variability in the measurement of human ventricular refractoriness.
    Kadish AH; Schmaltz S; Morady F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Sep; 14(9):1393-401. PubMed ID: 1720533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contribution of the anode to ventricular excitation during bipolar programmed electrical stimulation.
    Stevenson WG; Wiener I; Weiss JN
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 57(8):582-6. PubMed ID: 3953443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reentrant ventricular rhythms in the late myocardial infarction period: prevention of reentry by dual stimulation during basic rhythm.
    Restivo M; Gough WB; el-Sherif N
    Circulation; 1988 Feb; 77(2):429-44. PubMed ID: 3338133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Strength-interval relations in a chronic canine model of myocardial infarction. Implications for the interpretation of electrophysiologic studies.
    Michelson EL; Spear JF; Moore EN
    Circulation; 1981 May; 63(5):1158-65. PubMed ID: 7471377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nonuniform recovery of excitability in the left ventricle.
    Vassallo JA; Cassidy DM; Kindwall KE; Marchlinski FE; Josephson ME
    Circulation; 1988 Dec; 78(6):1365-72. PubMed ID: 3191591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.