212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3687731)
21. Amplified earmuffs: impact on speech intelligibility in industrial noise for listeners with hearing loss.
Dolan TG; O'Loughlin D
Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16180971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Determination of the characteristics of earmuffs subjected to the action of impulse noise.
Parmentier G; Buck K
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):213-22. PubMed ID: 6939091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
Alali KA; Casali JG
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measurement of effective noise exposure of workers wearing ear-muffs.
Kotarbińska E; Kozłowski E
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 19534852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Noise level and ultrasound spectra during burring.
Sorainen E; Rytkönen E
Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 12271344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prevention of acute acoustic trauma by earmuffs during military training.
Dhammadejsakdi N; Boonyanukul S; Jaruchinda S; Aramrattana A; Eiumtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92 Suppl 1():S1-6. PubMed ID: 21302411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Assessment and analysis of the acoustic environment of soldiers exposed to impulse noise].
Konopka W; Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M; Zalewski P; Miłoński J
Med Pr; 2002; 53(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 12577807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physical characteristics of gunfire impulse noise and its attenuation by hearing protectors.
Ylikoski M; Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Pääkkönen RJ; Ylikoski JS
Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7761796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Adjustment of dose-response relationship of industrial impulse noise induced high frequency hearing loss with different exchange rate].
Zhao YM; Chen SS; Cheng XR; Li YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 86(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 16606538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Noise attenuation of communication hearing protectors against impulses from assault rifle.
Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S
Mil Med; 1998 Jan; 163(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9465571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of noise reduction by earmuffs on the physiologic and behavioral responses in very low birth weight preterm infants.
Duran R; Ciftdemir NA; Ozbek UV; Berberoğlu U; Durankuş F; Süt N; Acunaş B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 76(10):1490-3. PubMed ID: 22824198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Measurement of personal noise exposure in a cold rolling mill].
Chai DL; Lü JQ; Zeng L; Su YG; Lei Z; Zhao YM
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 40(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 16640904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acoustic notch filtering earmuff utilizing Helmholtz resonator arrays.
Mizukoshi F; Takahashi H
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258842. PubMed ID: 34665827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Behavioural measurements in textile weavers wearing ear protectors.
Bhattacharya SK; Roy A; Tripathi SR; Chatterjee SK
Indian J Med Res; 1985 Jul; 82():56-64. PubMed ID: 4054986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors.
Lempert BL; Edwards RG
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):894-902. PubMed ID: 6660189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Protection efficiency of hearing protectors against military noise from handheld weapons and vehicles.
Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K
Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):11-20. PubMed ID: 16053601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
