212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3687731)
41. Subjective evaluation of a prototype earmuff exhibiting flat and nonlinear attenuation characteristics.
Stokes JP; Royster LH; Pearson RG; Royster JD
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Feb; 52(2):52-60. PubMed ID: 2011979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Bockstael A; Keppler H; Dhooge I; D'haenens W; Maes L; Philips B; Vinck B
Int J Audiol; 2008 Mar; 47(3):119-33. PubMed ID: 18307092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impulse noise and risk criteria.
Starck J; Toppila E; Pyykkö I
Noise Health; 2003; 5(20):63-73. PubMed ID: 14558894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of peak levels and number of impulses to hearing among forge hammering workers.
Suvorov G; Denisov E; Antipin V; Kharitonov V; Starck J; Pyykkö I; Toppila E
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Aug; 16(8):816-22. PubMed ID: 11504359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Digital high-speed sampling of combined exposure to noise and vibration.
Pekkarinen J; Starck J
Scand J Work Environ Health; 1986 Aug; 12(4 Spec No):327-31. PubMed ID: 3775317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Noise Exposure on a Warship during Firing of a Heavy Machine Gun.
Paddan GS
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Nov; 59(9):1208-11. PubMed ID: 26240198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Characteristics of noise in different branches of industry and efficacy of attenuating it using noise-proof headphones].
Stark Iu
Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1987 Mar; (3):14-7. PubMed ID: 3583020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Premature infant responses to noise reduction by earmuffs: effects on behavioral and physiologic measures.
Zahr LK; de Traversay J
J Perinatol; 1995; 15(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 8648453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A simple, cost-effective, and novel method for determining the efficiency of industrial and commercial noise-canceling earmuffs.
Zangari S; Mirowsky JE
Noise Health; 2019; 21(100):108-115. PubMed ID: 32655064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Measurement of real personal noise attenuation using earplugs with the E-A-Rfit system].
Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Scarselletta RS; Di Lorenzo L
Med Lav; 2013; 104(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 23879065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A qualitative assessment of the performance of electronic, level-dependent earmuffs when used on firing ranges.
Williams W
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):189-94. PubMed ID: 21368444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impulse noise measurement in view of noise hazard assessment and use of hearing protectors.
Mlynski R; Kozlowski E
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Jun; 29(2):528-537. PubMed ID: 36715312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Selection of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors for Use in An Indoor Shooting Range.
Mlynski R; Kozlowski E
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 31252535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
Neitzel R; Seixas N
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The efficiency of earmuffs against impulse noise from firearms.
Ylikoski J; Pekkarinen J; Starck J
Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 3629173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Ear protectors vs. intense impact noise.
Sataloff J; Sataloff RT
Occup Health Saf; 1983 Aug; 52(8):25, 28. PubMed ID: 6621966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Recognition of low-pass filtered words in a noisy and reverberant environment with and without earmuffs.
Pekkarinen E; Viljanen V; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2075414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Attenuation of hearing protectors at 85 dB SPL investigated by commercial "insertion gain" method.
Woxen O; Borchgrevink HM
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():145-55. PubMed ID: 1842461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
