These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3687731)

  • 61. Attenuation of hearing protectors at 85 dB SPL investigated by commercial "insertion gain" method.
    Woxen O; Borchgrevink HM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():145-55. PubMed ID: 1842461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Effectiveness of anti-noise lining, ear muffs and their combination under the effect of high-level impulse noise].
    Stark Iu; Pekkarinen Iu
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1990; (9):9-11. PubMed ID: 2262162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Noise levels in a burn intensive care unit.
    Cordova AC; Logishetty K; Fauerbach J; Price LA; Gibson BR; Milner SM
    Burns; 2013 Feb; 39(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 22541620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Hearing protection for industry: types, selection vary with needs.
    Occup Health Saf; 1985 Jul; 54(7):22-5. PubMed ID: 4022531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Speech recognition in a noisy and reverberant environment with and without earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen E; Viljanen V; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
    Audiology; 1990; 29(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 2275643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Usage of ear muffs in a noisy factory. A questionnaire study].
    Marzen LE; May O
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1984 Apr; 146(16):1238-41. PubMed ID: 6610240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Relationship between impulse noise and continuous noise inducing hearing loss by dosimeter measurement in working populations].
    Zhao YM; Chen SS; Cheng XR; Li YQ
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 39(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 16329800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Balance communication, protection to solve industrial noise problem.
    Michael K
    Occup Health Saf; 1989 Nov; 58(12):16, 21-4. PubMed ID: 2594299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. An exploratory study of moderate physical activity and selected design attribute effects on earmuff attenuation.
    Casali JG; Grenell JF
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Sep; 50(9):480-5. PubMed ID: 2801516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Design of enclosure of a grinding machine for the noise attenuation.
    Gorai AK; Mukhopadhyay AK; Pal AK; Dey UK
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2008 Apr; 50(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19295099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The effect of various hearing protectors on sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes.
    Noble W; Murray N; Waugh R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Jul; 51(7):370-7. PubMed ID: 2382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Efficacy of enforcement in an industrial hearing conservation program.
    Hager WL; Hoyle ER; Hermann ER
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1982 Jun; 43(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 7113926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effects of coldness on the protective performance of earmuffs.
    Starck J; Toppila E; Laitinen H
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):47-53. PubMed ID: 16053605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Investigation of sound level conversion as a means of rating ear protector performance.
    Waugh R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Apr; 37(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 1274842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Performance of different types of hearing protectors undergoing high-level impulse noise.
    Buck K
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 19534855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Attenuation of peak sound pressure levels of shooting noise by hearing protective earmuffs.
    Lenzuni P; Sangiorgi T; Cerini L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(58):91-9. PubMed ID: 22718106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.