233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36878110)
1. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation stratified by corticospinal organization in children with hemiparesis.
Nemanich ST; Lench DH; Sutter EN; Kowalski JL; Francis SM; Meekins GD; Krach LE; Feyma T; Gillick BT
Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2023 Mar; 43():27-35. PubMed ID: 36878110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurophysiological signatures of hand motor response to dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke: a TMS and MEG study.
Kuo IJ; Tang CW; Tsai YA; Tang SC; Lin CJ; Hsu SP; Liang WK; Juan CH; Zich C; Stagg CJ; Lee IH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 32527268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24hours.
Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Feb; 49(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 30635162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aftereffects of 2 noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on corticospinal excitability in persons with chronic stroke: a pilot study.
Goh HT; Chan HY; Abdul-Latif L
J Neurol Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 39(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25427033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke.
Kwon TG; Park E; Kang C; Chang WH; Kim YH
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 34(6):915-923. PubMed ID: 27689549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.
Strube W; Bunse T; Nitsche MA; Nikolaeva A; Palm U; Padberg F; Falkai P; Hasan A
Physiol Rep; 2016 Aug; 4(15):. PubMed ID: 27495298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revisiting interhemispheric imbalance in chronic stroke: A tDCS study.
McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Byblow WD
Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Jan; 129(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 29145166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function and cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Gong Y; Long XM; Xu Y; Cai XY; Ye M
Clin Rehabil; 2021 May; 35(5):718-727. PubMed ID: 33222502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcranial direct-current stimulation reduced the excitability of diaphragmatic corticospinal pathways whatever the polarity used.
Azabou E; Roche N; Sharshar T; Bussel B; Lofaso F; Petitjean M
Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2013 Oct; 189(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 23933029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans.
Bashir S; Ahmad S; Alatefi M; Hamza A; Sharaf M; Fecteau S; Yoo WK
Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(13):e14087. PubMed ID: 31301123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects.
Kim YJ; Ku J; Cho S; Kim HJ; Cho YK; Lim T; Kang YJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Aug; 11():124. PubMed ID: 25135003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke - Motor excitability and motor function.
Yasaroglu S; Liepert J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Dec; 144():16-22. PubMed ID: 36208617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms.
Hassanzahraee M; Nitsche MA; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):832-839. PubMed ID: 32289714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
