169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36878283)
1. Is hybrid fixation in revision TKA using LCCK prostheses reliable?
Laudren A; Delacroix R; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 109(5):103583. PubMed ID: 36878283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.
Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Oakley C; Willems JH; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek P; Rozell J; Marwin S; Schwarzkopf R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1537-1547. PubMed ID: 36243781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum 5-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for a Single Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty System Using Hybrid Fixation and Press-Fit Stems.
Lim JBT; Somerville L; Vasarhelyi EM; Howard JL; Naudie DDR; McCalden RW
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jun; 38(6S):S297-S301. PubMed ID: 37003457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.
Sandiford NA; Misur P; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Masri BA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 27287857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties.
Wood GC; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ; McCalden RW; Bourne RB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 467(3):810-7. PubMed ID: 19034597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 30-mm cemented stem extension provides adequate fixation of the tibial component in revision knee arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 24554459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of extension stem length and diameter on clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty.
Lee SH; Shih HN; Chang CH; Lu TW; Chang YH; Lin YC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jan; 21(1):15. PubMed ID: 31914984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis.
Sanz-Ruiz P; Villanueva-Martínez M; Matas-Diez JA; Vaquero-Martín J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():39. PubMed ID: 25888058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No difference in long-term micromotion between fully cemented and hybrid fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Mills K; Wymenga AB; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek PJC
Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):875-883. PubMed ID: 35775183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tibial metaphyseal cones combined with short stems perform as well as long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Batinica B; Bolam SM; D'Arcy M; Zhu M; Monk AP; Munro JT
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Sep; 92(9):2254-2260. PubMed ID: 35754371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trabecular Metal Cones Combined With Short Cemented Stem Allow Favorable Outcomes in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Jacquet C; Ros F; Guy S; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):657-663. PubMed ID: 32978026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
