These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36878330)

  • 1. An extension minimal important difference credibility item addressing construct proximity is a reliable alternative to the correlation item.
    Wang Y; Devji T; Carrasco-Labra A; Qasim A; Hao Q; Kum E; Devasenapathy N; King MT; Terluin B; Terwee CB; Walsh M; Furukawa TA; Tsujimoto Y; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 May; 157():46-52. PubMed ID: 36878330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study.
    Devji T; Carrasco-Labra A; Qasim A; Phillips M; Johnston BC; Devasenapathy N; Zeraatkar D; Bhatt M; Jin X; Brignardello-Petersen R; Urquhart O; Foroutan F; Schandelmaier S; Pardo-Hernandez H; Vernooij RW; Huang H; Rizwan Y; Siemieniuk R; Lytvyn L; Patrick DL; Ebrahim S; Furukawa T; Nesrallah G; Schünemann HJ; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    BMJ; 2020 Jun; 369():m1714. PubMed ID: 32499297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serious reporting deficiencies exist in minimal important difference studies: current state and suggestions for improvement.
    Carrasco-Labra A; Devji T; Qasim A; Phillips M; Johnston BC; Devasenapathy N; Zeraatkar D; Bhatt M; Jin X; Brignardello-Petersen R; Urquhart O; Foroutan F; Schandelmaier S; Pardo-Hernandez H; Vernooij RW; Huang H; Rizwan Y; Siemieniuk R; Lytvyn L; Patrick DL; Ebrahim S; Furukawa TA; Nesrallah G; Schunemann HJ; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 150():25-32. PubMed ID: 35760237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol.
    Johnston BC; Ebrahim S; Carrasco-Labra A; Furukawa TA; Patrick DL; Crawford MW; Hemmelgarn BR; Schunemann HJ; Guyatt GH; Nesrallah G
    BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e007953. PubMed ID: 26428330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a
    Hao Q; Devji T; Zeraatkar D; Wang Y; Qasim A; Siemieniuk RAC; Vandvik PO; Lähdeoja T; Carrasco-Labra A; Agoritsas T; Guyatt G
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e028777. PubMed ID: 30787096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: A systematic survey.
    Carrasco-Labra A; Devji T; Qasim A; Phillips MR; Wang Y; Johnston BC; Devasenapathy N; Zeraatkar D; Bhatt M; Jin X; Brignardello-Petersen R; Urquhart O; Foroutan F; Schandelmaier S; Pardo-Hernandez H; Hao Q; Wong V; Ye Z; Yao L; Vernooij RWM; Huang H; Zeng L; Rizwan Y; Siemieniuk R; Lytvyn L; Patrick DL; Ebrahim S; Furukawa TA; Nesrallah G; Schünemann HJ; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():61-71. PubMed ID: 33321175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Credibility and Generalization of the Minimally Important Difference Concept in Dermatology: A Scoping Review.
    Speeckaert R; Belpaire A; Herbelet S; Lambert J; van Geel N
    JAMA Dermatol; 2022 Nov; 158(11):1304-1314. PubMed ID: 36044227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic survey identified methodological issues in studies estimating anchor-based minimal important differences in patient-reported outcomes.
    Wang Y; Devji T; Qasim A; Hao Q; Wong V; Bhatt M; Prasad M; Wang Y; Noori A; Xiao Y; Ghadimi M; Lozano LEC; Phillips MR; Carrasco-Labra A; King M; Terluin B; Terwee CB; Walsh M; Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 142():144-151. PubMed ID: 34752937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform
    Devji T; Guyatt GH; Lytvyn L; Brignardello-Petersen R; Foroutan F; Sadeghirad B; Buchbinder R; Poolman RW; Harris IA; Carrasco-Labra A; Siemieniuk RAC; Vandvik PO
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e015587. PubMed ID: 28495818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures-a systematic review.
    Nordin Å; Taft C; Lundgren-Nilsson Å; Dencker A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():62. PubMed ID: 27387456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
    Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-reported questionnaires in MS rehabilitation: responsiveness and minimal important difference of the multiple sclerosis questionnaire for physiotherapists (MSQPT).
    van der Maas NA
    BMC Neurol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 28302081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.
    Barbosa-Silva J; Calixtre LB; Von Piekartz D; Driusso P; Armijo-Olivo S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):60. PubMed ID: 38459428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can the minimal clinically important difference be determined in a French-speaking population with primary hip replacement using one PROM item and the Anchor strategy?
    Putman S; Dartus J; Migaud H; Pasquier G; Girard J; Preda C; Duhamel A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102830. PubMed ID: 33524632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of a set of patient reported outcome measures to assess effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis.
    Guruparan Y; Navaratinaraja TS; Selvaratnam G; Gunawardena N; Sri Ranganathan S
    BMC Pulm Med; 2021 Sep; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 34535111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using multiple anchor- and distribution-based estimates to evaluate clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic Response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) instrument.
    Yost KJ; Sorensen MV; Hahn EA; Glendenning GA; Gnanasakthy A; Cella D
    Value Health; 2005; 8(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 15804320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mind the methods of determining minimal important differences: three critical issues to consider.
    Devji T; Carrasco-Labra A; Guyatt G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2021 May; 24(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 32839275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urinary Stones and Intervention Quality of Life (USIQoL): Development and Validation of a New Core Universal Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Urinary Calculi.
    Joshi HB; Johnson H; Pietropaolo A; Raja A; Joyce AD; Somani B; Philip J; Biyani CS; Pickles T
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jan; 8(1):283-290. PubMed ID: 33423970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.
    Kuo AC; Giori NJ; Bowe TR; Manfredi L; Lalani NF; Nordin DA; Harris AHS
    JAMA Surg; 2020 May; 155(5):404-411. PubMed ID: 32211842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for psychotherapeutic interventions in people with seizures: A mixed methods study.
    Michaelis R; Meyer S; Reuber M; Schöne C
    Epilepsy Behav; 2019 Oct; 99():106464. PubMed ID: 31421518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.