These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36878330)

  • 21. Upper Quadrant Edema Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Is Reliable, Valid, and Efficient for Patients With Lymphatic and Venous Disorders.
    Deutscher D; Hayes D; Cook KF; Werneke MW; Tucker CA; Mioduski JE; Levenhagen K; Tidhar D; Pfarr M; Kallen MA
    Phys Ther; 2021 Dec; 101(12):. PubMed ID: 34636891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterising the potential for recall bias in anchor-based MCID calculation of patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis.
    McCann AC; Phillips KM; Trope M; Caradonna DS; Gray ST; Sedaghat AR
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 45(5):768-774. PubMed ID: 32449602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory and Other Dysphagia Measurements in Patients Undergoing ACDF.
    Okano I; Ortiz Miller C; Salzmann SN; Hoshino Y; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2309-2320. PubMed ID: 32282534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.
    Bagó J; Pérez-Grueso FJ; Les E; Hernández P; Pellisé F
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1898-904. PubMed ID: 19533179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The PU-PROM: A patient-reported outcome measure for peptic ulcer disease.
    Liu N; Lv J; Liu J; Zhang Y
    Health Expect; 2017 Dec; 20(6):1350-1366. PubMed ID: 28636163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identifying the minimal important difference in patient-reported outcome measures in the field of people with severe mental illness: a pre-post-analysis of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme.
    Beentjes TAA; Teerenstra S; Vermeulen H; Goossens PJJ; der Sanden MWGN; van Gaal BGI
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1723-1733. PubMed ID: 33594528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ(®) Instrument.
    Wright DD; Paty J; Turner-Bowker DM; Bradbury A
    Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 27016239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Meaningful thresholds for patient-reported outcomes following interventions for anterior cruciate ligament tear or traumatic meniscus injury: a systematic review for the OPTIKNEE consensus.
    Macri EM; Young JJ; Ingelsrud LH; Khan KM; Terluin B; Juhl CB; Whittaker JL; Culvenor AG; Crossley KM; Roos EM
    Br J Sports Med; 2022 Dec; 56(24):1432-1444. PubMed ID: 35973755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients.
    Yost KJ; Eton DT; Garcia SF; Cella D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 21447427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability and validity of the Patient Benefit Assessment Scale for Hospitalised Older Patients (P-BAS HOP).
    van der Kluit MJ; Dijkstra GJ; de Rooij SE
    BMC Geriatr; 2021 Mar; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33648447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.
    Walters SJ; Brazier JE
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 Apr; 1():4. PubMed ID: 12737635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient-reported outcome measures of musculoskeletal symptoms and psychosocial factors in musicians: a systematic review of psychometric properties.
    Roos M; Dagenais M; Pflieger S; Roy JS
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2547-2566. PubMed ID: 35118588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores in patients with ovarian cancer.
    Musoro JZ; Coens C; Greimel E; King MT; Sprangers MAG; Nordin A; van Dorst EBL; Groenvold M; Cocks K; Velikova G; Flechtner HH; Bottomley A;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):515-521. PubMed ID: 32972782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient reported outcome measure-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS): Development, reliability and construct validity.
    Kuiper SZ; Kimman ML; Van Tol RR; Waardenburg SF; Van Kuijk SMJ; Dirksen CD; Breukink SO
    Colorectal Dis; 2022 Aug; 24(8):992-999. PubMed ID: 35119715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: Defining Minimal and Clinically Important Changes.
    Li T; Timmins HC; Trinh T; Mizrahi D; Harrison M; Horvath LG; Grimison P; Friedlander M; Kiernan MC; King MT; Rutherford C; Goldstein D; Park SB
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2023 Feb; 21(2):125-132.e3. PubMed ID: 36791763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Minimal Important Difference and Responder Definition in the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 Module for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Surgically Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
    Reni M; Braverman J; Hendifar A; Li CP; Macarulla T; Oh DY; Riess H; Tempero M; Lu B; Marcus J; Joshi N; Botteman M; Dueck AC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7545-7554. PubMed ID: 33813673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review.
    Ousmen A; Touraine C; Deliu N; Cottone F; Bonnetain F; Efficace F; Brédart A; Mollevi C; Anota A
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):228. PubMed ID: 30537955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Establishing thresholds for meaningful within-individual change using longitudinal item response theory.
    Bjorner JB; Terluin B; Trigg A; Hu J; Brady KJS; Griffiths P
    Qual Life Res; 2023 May; 32(5):1267-1276. PubMed ID: 35870045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) Questionnaire and its potential as a single-item outcome measure in clinical practice.
    Holland R; Tillett W; Korendowych E; Cavill C; Waldron N; Brooke M; McHugh NJ
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2018 Mar; 77(3):343-347. PubMed ID: 29146740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Construct Validity and Responsiveness of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.
    Nelson EO; Kliethermes S; Heiderscheit B
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2020 Dec; 50(12):702-710. PubMed ID: 33115339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.