These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36880941)

  • 1. Response to comment on 'Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes'.
    Kemble J; Koo K
    BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):635. PubMed ID: 36880941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on 'environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes'.
    Baboudjian M; Bastide C; Lechevallier E
    BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):634. PubMed ID: 36820507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes.
    Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB
    J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.
    Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M
    J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
    Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
    J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures.
    Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes.
    Kemble JP; Winoker JS; Patel SH; Su ZT; Matlaga BR; Potretzke AM; Koo K
    BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 36515438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
    Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
    World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Workflow efficiencies for flexible cystoscopy: comparing single-use vs reusable cystoscopes.
    Haislip I; Rindorf D; Cool C; Tester B
    BMC Urol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):53. PubMed ID: 38448827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1465. PubMed ID: 35620912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time Efficiency and Performance of Single-Use
    Chen R; Baas C; Farkouh A; Shete K; Peverini DR; Hartman JC; Amasyali AS; Belle J; Baldwin EA; Baldwin DD
    J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 37800857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conversion to Disposable Cystoscopes Decreased Post-procedure Encounters and Infections Compared to Reusable Cystoscopes.
    Geldmaker LE; Baird BA; Lyon TD; Regele EJ; Wajswol EJ; Pathak RA; Petrou SP; Haehn DA; Gajarawala NM; Ball CT; Broderick GA; Thiel DD
    Urol Pract; 2023 Jul; 10(4):312-317. PubMed ID: 37228224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.
    Kim J; Gao B; Bhojani N; Zorn KC; Chughtai B; Elterman DS
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Oct; 16(10):346-350. PubMed ID: 35621291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope: A Multi-Institutional International Study.
    Scotland K; Wong VKF; Chan JYH; Tawfiek E; Chiura A; Chew BH; Bagley D
    J Endourol; 2020 Sep; 34(9):981-986. PubMed ID: 32578453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better".
    Rizan C; Bhutta MF
    J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1466-1467. PubMed ID: 35848502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post-cystoscopy infections and device malfunctions in reprocessed flexible cystoscopes in a national database.
    Lee J; Kaplan-Marans E; Jivanji D; Tennenbaum D; Schulman A
    Can J Urol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):11361-11365. PubMed ID: 36495577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Utility of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope Compared with a Standard Reusable Device: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.
    Holmes A; O'Kane D; Wombwell A; Grills R
    J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 36128833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Impact of Single-Use Cystoscopes on Clinical Time Workflow in an Outpatient Setting.
    Medairos R; Soto-Palou F; Barquin DL; Margolin EJ; Locascio R; Antonelli J; Preminger G; Lipkin M
    Urology; 2024 Jun; 188():7-10. PubMed ID: 38653386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer.
    Seyam RM; Zeitouni OM; Alsibai TM; AlAyoub AJ; Al-Qassab OM; AlDeiry MA; Zino AO; Hulwi HS; Mokhtar AA; Shahbaz M; Junejo NN; Alotaibi MF; Alzahrani HM; Alothman KI; Alkhateeb SS; Al-Hussain TO; Altaweel WM
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13495. PubMed ID: 32778771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disposable versus Reusable Cystoscopes: A Micro-Costing Value Analysis in High-Volume and Low-Volume Urology Practices.
    Young JA; Garden EB; Al-Alao O; Deoraj D; Small AC; Hruby G; Grotas AB; Palese MA
    Urol Pract; 2021 Jul; 8(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 37145468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.