155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36881101)
1. Operator Sex and Experience Do Not Influence Conization Outcomes in Terms of Cone Volume, Depth or Resection Margins.
Stefanovic S; Mitic IS; Sütterlin M; WEIß C; Spaich S
In Vivo; 2023; 37(2):841-847. PubMed ID: 36881101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Syringe or mask? Loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local or general anesthesia: a randomized trial.
Rezniczek GA; Hecken JM; Rehman S; Dogan A; Tempfer CB; Hilal Z
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):888.e1-888.e9. PubMed ID: 32585223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnancy outcomes after cold knife conization related to excised cone dimensions. A retrospective cohort study.
Sozen H; Namazov A; Cakir S; Akdemir Y; Vatansever D; Karateke A
J Reprod Med; 2014; 59(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 24597292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conization of the uterine cervix: does the level of gynecologist's training predict margin status?
Ulrich D; Tamussino K; Petru E; Haas J; Reich O
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 Jul; 31(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 22653354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Antonakou A; Sindos M; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Sakellaropoulos G; Antsaklis A
In Vivo; 2011; 25(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 21709016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of conization type on the resected cone volume: results of a retrospective multi-center study.
Grimm C; Brammen L; Sliutz G; Weigert M; Sevelda P; Pils S; Reinthaller A; Polterauer S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1081-6. PubMed ID: 23649464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data.
Patrelli TS; Anfuso S; Vandi F; Valitutto S; Migliore M; Salvati MA; De Ioris A; Condemi V; Fadda GM; Bacchi Modena A; Nardelli GB
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 18560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial.
Hilal Z; Rezniczek GA; Alici F; Kumpernatz A; Dogan A; Alieva L; Tempfer CB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 219(4):377.e1-377.e7. PubMed ID: 30063903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy vs dynamic spectral imaging directed biopsy in correctly identifying the grade of cervical dysplasia in women undergoing conization: A methodological study.
Booth BB; Petersen LK; Blaakaer J; Johansen T; Mertz H; Dahl K; Bor P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Aug; 99(8):1064-1070. PubMed ID: 32105344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization.
Ge Y; Liu Y; Cheng Y; Liu Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(27):e26359. PubMed ID: 34232170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies.
Pinborg A; Ortoft G; Loft A; Rasmussen SC; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 25358346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
