148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36881242)
21. [Optimization of urban ecological spatial structure based on network analysis: A case study of Changzhou City, China].
Wu QL; Li FX; Zhang QS; Li MC
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1983-1992. PubMed ID: 36052803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Ecological network construction and optimization in Foshan City, China].
Shen QW; Lin ML; Mo HP; Huang YB; Hu XY; Wei LW; Zheng YS; Lu DF
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Sep; 32(9):3288-3298. PubMed ID: 34658215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Constructing the Landscape Ecological Security Pattern in the Dawen River Basin in China: A Framework Based on the Circuit Principle.
Li J; Shan R; Yuan W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36982092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Constructing the Ecological Security Pattern of Nujiang Prefecture Based on the Framework of "Importance-Sensitivity-Connectivity".
Li Y; Zhao J; Yuan J; Ji P; Deng X; Yang Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Integrating ecosystem services and landscape connectivity into the optimization of ecological security pattern: a case study of the Pearl River Delta, China.
Wang S; Wu M; Hu M; Xia B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76051-76065. PubMed ID: 35665456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Construction of Landscape Ecological Security Pattern in the Zhundong Region, Xinjiang, NW China.
Jiang J; Abulizi A; Abliz A; Zayiti A; Akbar A; Ou B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 35627837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Evaluation of ecological conservation red line from the perspective of ecological security pattern: Taking Zhejiang Province, China as an example].
Feng BO; Yue WZ; Xia HX
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2022 Sep; 33(9):2466-2474. PubMed ID: 36131663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial analysis enables priority selection in conservation practices for landscapes that need ecological security.
Tang H; Peng J; Jiang H; Lin Y; Dong J; Liu M; Meersmans J
J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118888. PubMed ID: 37690245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of green infrastructure networks based on potential green roof integration in a high-density urban area-A case study of Beijing, China.
Dong J; Guo F; Lin M; Zhang H; Zhu P
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 834():155307. PubMed ID: 35439511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Construction of ecological network in Qujing city based on MSPA and MCR models.
Qin JZ; Dai JP; Li SH; Zhang JZ; Peng JS
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9800. PubMed ID: 38684705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Landscape connectivity of waterbody network in the new reclamation region of Lianyungang based on effective distance model].
Qiao FZ; Zheng ZM; Li JL; Zheng WB
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2014 Aug; 25(8):2327-33. PubMed ID: 25509085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Urban ecological security pattern construction coupled with risk and service: A case study of Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province, China.
Pan WT; Yue BR; Yao LJ; Xue JF; Li JF
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2023 Jan; 34(1):178-186. PubMed ID: 36799392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimizing the ecological network of resource-based cities to enhance the resilience of regional ecological networks.
Zhao Y; Zhang M; Zhao D; Duo L; Lu C
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(11):17182-17205. PubMed ID: 38334919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identification of priority areas for ecological restoration based on ecological security and landscape elements.
Zhang J; Chen H; Ma Y; Liu D; Liang X; Chen W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(12):35307-35325. PubMed ID: 36527548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on the circuit theory: a case study of Hohhot City.
Wu W; Zhao S; Guo J; Ou M; Ding G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(38):89597-89615. PubMed ID: 37454379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Linking G2SFCA method and circuit theory to promote spatial equity and landscape connectivity in urban ecological infrastructure.
Huang L; Lu Y; Wang J
J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119208. PubMed ID: 37827084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Construction and evaluation of ecological network in Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone, China.].
Chen XP; Chen WB
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 May; 27(5):1611-1618. PubMed ID: 29732824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative ecological network pattern analysis: a case of Nanchang.
Ma B; Chen ZA; Wei X; Li X; Zhang L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37423-37434. PubMed ID: 35066835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identifying Ecological Corridors and Networks in Mountainous Areas.
Zhou D; Song W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33946334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Ecological Connectivity in the Ethnic Areas, Sichuan Province, China.
Guo S; Deng X; Ran J; Ding X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36232239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
