These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36881407)

  • 21. Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus.
    Katsumi O; Arai M; Wajima R; Denno S; Hirose T
    Vision Res; 1996 Mar; 36(6):903-9. PubMed ID: 8736223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A robust index of lexical representation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as evidenced by EEG responses to fast periodic visual stimulation.
    Lochy A; Van Belle G; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 25448857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Objective measurement of visual resolution using the P300 to self-facial images.
    Marhöfer DJ; Bach M; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 131(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 25976745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life.
    Polevoy C; Muckle G; Séguin JR; Ouellet E; Saint-Amour D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 28220265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effect of Different Attentional Conditions on ERP Detection of Visual Acuity].
    Meng HH; Luo B; Siyit T; Ji MM; Chen XP; Shi GF; Tao LY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 33(2):125-128. PubMed ID: 29231016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 32-channel mouse EEG: Visual evoked potentials.
    Land R; Kapche A; Ebbers L; Kral A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Sep; 325():108316. PubMed ID: 31251949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Normal vernier acuity in infants with delayed visual maturation.
    Good WV; Hou C
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 15234296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Separable effects of inversion and contrast-reversal on face detection thresholds and response functions: a sweep VEP study.
    Liu-Shuang J; Ales J; Rossion B; Norcia AM
    J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER.
    Arai M; Katsumi O; Paranhos FR; Lopes De Faria JM; Hirose T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1997 Jul; 235(7):442-7. PubMed ID: 9248841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age norms for monocular grating acuity measured by sweep-VEP in the first three years of age.
    Salomão SR; Ejzenbaum F; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Pereira JM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 18797653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of objective assessment using the sweep pattern visual evoked response acuity (SPVERA) and illiterate E visual acuity].
    Liu RJ; Liu HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 22(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17190145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life.
    Norcia AM; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(10):1399-408. PubMed ID: 4090273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of visual acuity with a digital eye chart: optotypes, presentation modalities and repeatability.
    Campo Dall'Orto G; Facchin A; Bellatorre A; Maffioletti S; Serio M
    J Optom; 2021; 14(2):133-141. PubMed ID: 33139229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sweep visual evoked potential testing as a predictor of recognition acuity in albinism.
    Bradfield YS; France TD; Verhoeve J; Gangnon RE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 125(5):628-33. PubMed ID: 17502501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.
    Hill NJ; Gupta D; Brunner P; Gunduz A; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):. PubMed ID: 22782131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Suppression of 12-Hz SSVEPs when viewing familiar faces: An electrophysiological index to detect recognition.
    Lui M; Lui KFH; Wong AC; Rosenfeld JP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Nov; 133():159-168. PubMed ID: 30318051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials.
    Rossion B; Boremanse A
    J Vis; 2011 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 21346000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of motion on pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in adults and children.
    Mackie RT; McCulloch DL; Bradnam MS; Glegg M; Evans AL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995-1996; 91(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 8899307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.