These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36881426)

  • 21. Review: comparison of PET rubidium-82 with conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Ghotbi AA; Kjaer A; Hasbak P
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2014 May; 34(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 24028171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.
    Murthy VL; Bateman TM; Beanlands RS; Berman DS; Borges-Neto S; Chareonthaitawee P; Cerqueira MD; deKemp RA; DePuey EG; Dilsizian V; Dorbala S; Ficaro EP; Garcia EV; Gewirtz H; Heller GV; Lewin HC; Malhotra S; Mann A; Ruddy TD; Schindler TH; Schwartz RG; Slomka PJ; Soman P; Di Carli MF; Einstein A; Russell R; Corbett JR
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):269-297. PubMed ID: 29243073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative PET measurements of myocardial blood flow in young, healthy volunteers what should we expect?
    Gewirtz H
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):413-5. PubMed ID: 21492817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve by CZT-SPECT: A head to head comparison with
    Acampa W; Zampella E; Assante R; Genova A; De Simini G; Mannarino T; D'Antonio A; Gaudieri V; Nappi C; Buongiorno P; Mainolfi CG; Petretta M; Cuocolo A
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2827-2839. PubMed ID: 32383083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Leaving relativity behind: quantitative clinical perfusion imaging.
    Bengel FM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 58(7):749-51. PubMed ID: 21816312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography.
    Lee JM; Kim CH; Koo BK; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Jeon KH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Na SH; Ahn JM; Park SJ; Kim HS
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27609817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prognostic Interplay Between Exercise Capacity and PET-Derived Myocardial Flow Reserve: FIT-PET Study.
    Ahmed AI; Al Rifai M; Alahdab F; Alfawara MS; Han Y; Nayfeh M; Mahmarian JJ; Nabi F; Soliman A; Patel K; Zoghbi WA; Al-Mallah MH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Apr; 17(4):460-462. PubMed ID: 38099913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Myocardial creep and cardiorespiratory motion correction improves diagnostic accuracy of Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography.
    Lassen ML; Rasmussen T; Byrne C; Holmvang L; Kjaer A; Hasbak P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2289-2300. PubMed ID: 37624562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of prompt gamma compensation on myocardial blood flow measurements with rubidium-82 dynamic PET.
    Armstrong IS; Memmott MJ; Tonge CM; Arumugam P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):596-605. PubMed ID: 27624818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative relationship between coronary artery calcium and myocardial blood flow by hybrid rubidium-82 PET/CT imaging in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Assante R; Zampella E; Arumugam P; Acampa W; Imbriaco M; Tout D; Petretta M; Tonge C; Cuocolo A
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):494-501. PubMed ID: 26780529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [
    Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Schumacher SP; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):e007417. PubMed ID: 29703779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
    Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?
    Saraste A; Kajander S; Han C; Nesterov SV; Knuuti J
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 19(5):1044-59. PubMed ID: 22733534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography imaging: an overview for the general cardiologist.
    Dhar R; Ananthasubramaniam K
    Cardiol Rev; 2011; 19(5):255-63. PubMed ID: 21808169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of two dipyridamole infusion protocols for myocardial perfusion imaging in subjects with low likelihood of significant obstructive coronary artery disease.
    Harel F; Finnerty V; Authier S; Pelletier-Galarneau M
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1820-1828. PubMed ID: 30367380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by
    Zampella E; Acampa W; Assante R; Nappi C; Gaudieri V; Mainolfi CG; Green R; Cantoni V; Panico M; Klain M; Petretta M; Slomka PJ; Cuocolo A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 29372272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of unexpected factors on quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in young, asymptomatic volunteers.
    Sdringola S; Johnson NP; Kirkeeide RL; Cid E; Gould KL
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 21492816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve obtained by 82-rubidium positron emission tomography in long-term follow-up after heart transplantation.
    Nelson LM; Christensen TE; Rossing K; Hasbak P; Gustafsson F
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):2555-2567. PubMed ID: 34414554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical Value of Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Blood Flow Quantification.
    Di Carli MF
    Cardiol Clin; 2023 May; 41(2):185-195. PubMed ID: 37003676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia.
    Juneau D; Wu KY; Kaps N; Yao J; Renaud JM; Beanlands RSB; Ruddy TD; deKemp RA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):835-850. PubMed ID: 33389638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.