195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36881621)
21. Highly efficient CRISPR/HDR-mediated knock-in for mouse embryonic stem cells and zygotes.
Wang B; Li K; Wang A; Reiser M; Saunders T; Lockey RF; Wang JW
Biotechniques; 2015 Oct; 59(4):201-2, 204, 206-8. PubMed ID: 26458548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Designed nucleases for targeted genome editing.
Lee J; Chung JH; Kim HM; Kim DW; Kim H
Plant Biotechnol J; 2016 Feb; 14(2):448-62. PubMed ID: 26369767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Combi-CRISPR: combination of NHEJ and HDR provides efficient and precise plasmid-based knock-ins in mice and rats.
Yoshimi K; Oka Y; Miyasaka Y; Kotani Y; Yasumura M; Uno Y; Hattori K; Tanigawa A; Sato M; Oya M; Nakamura K; Matsushita N; Kobayashi K; Mashimo T
Hum Genet; 2021 Feb; 140(2):277-287. PubMed ID: 32617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Gene Editing With TALEN and CRISPR/Cas in Rice.
Bi H; Yang B
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2017; 149():81-98. PubMed ID: 28712502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modulation of the microhomology-mediated end joining pathway suppresses large deletions and enhances homology-directed repair following CRISPR-Cas9-induced DNA breaks.
Yuan B; Bi C; Tian Y; Wang J; Jin Y; Alsayegh K; Tehseen M; Yi G; Zhou X; Shao Y; Romero FV; Fischle W; Izpisua Belmonte JC; Hamdan S; Huang Y; Li M
BMC Biol; 2024 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 38685010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ligation-assisted homologous recombination enables precise genome editing by deploying both MMEJ and HDR.
Zhao Z; Shang P; Sage F; Geijsen N
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jun; 50(11):e62. PubMed ID: 35212386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Strategies for Enhancing the Homology-Directed Repair Efficiency of CRISPR-Cas Systems.
Sun W; Liu H; Yin W; Qiao J; Zhao X; Liu Y
CRISPR J; 2022 Feb; 5(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 35076280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inhibition of 53BP1 favors homology-dependent DNA repair and increases CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency.
Canny MD; Moatti N; Wan LCK; Fradet-Turcotte A; Krasner D; Mateos-Gomez PA; Zimmermann M; Orthwein A; Juang YC; Zhang W; Noordermeer SM; Seclen E; Wilson MD; Vorobyov A; Munro M; Ernst A; Ng TF; Cho T; Cannon PM; Sidhu SS; Sicheri F; Durocher D
Nat Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 29176614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Targeted Gene Insertion and Replacement in the Basidiomycete Ganoderma lucidum by Inactivation of Nonhomologous End Joining Using CRISPR/Cas9.
Tu JL; Bai XY; Xu YL; Li N; Xu JW
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 87(23):e0151021. PubMed ID: 34524900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gene editing using ssODNs with engineered endonucleases.
Chen F; Pruett-Miller SM; Davis GD
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1239():251-65. PubMed ID: 25408411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Can Designer Indels Be Tailored by Gene Editing?: Can Indels Be Customized?
Trimidal SG; Benjamin R; Bae JE; Han MV; Kong E; Singer A; Williams TS; Yang B; Schiller MR
Bioessays; 2019 Dec; 41(12):e1900126. PubMed ID: 31693213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Systematic quantification of HDR and NHEJ reveals effects of locus, nuclease, and cell type on genome-editing.
Miyaoka Y; Berman JR; Cooper SB; Mayerl SJ; Chan AH; Zhang B; Karlin-Neumann GA; Conklin BR
Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23549. PubMed ID: 27030102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Opportunities and challenges with CRISPR-Cas mediated homologous recombination based precise editing in plants and animals.
Singh S; Chaudhary R; Deshmukh R; Tiwari S
Plant Mol Biol; 2023 Jan; 111(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 36315306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Increasing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed DNA repair by histone deacetylase inhibitors.
Li G; Zhang X; Wang H; Liu D; Li Z; Wu Z; Yang H
Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2020 Aug; 125():105790. PubMed ID: 32534122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic evaluation of CRISPR-Cas systems reveals design principles for genome editing in human cells.
Wang Y; Liu KI; Sutrisnoh NB; Srinivasan H; Zhang J; Li J; Zhang F; Lalith CRJ; Xing H; Shanmugam R; Foo JN; Yeo HT; Ooi KH; Bleckwehl T; Par YYR; Lee SM; Ismail NNB; Sanwari NAB; Lee STV; Lew J; Tan MH
Genome Biol; 2018 May; 19(1):62. PubMed ID: 29843790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Simultaneous precise editing of multiple genes in human cells.
Riesenberg S; Chintalapati M; Macak D; Kanis P; Maricic T; Pääbo S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Nov; 47(19):e116. PubMed ID: 31392986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA.
Richardson CD; Ray GJ; DeWitt MA; Curie GL; Corn JE
Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 26789497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Target residence of Cas9-sgRNA influences DNA double-strand break repair pathway choices in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
Liu SC; Feng YL; Sun XN; Chen RD; Liu Q; Xiao JJ; Zhang JN; Huang ZC; Xiang JF; Chen GQ; Yang Y; Lou C; Li HD; Cai Z; Xu SM; Lin H; Xie AY
Genome Biol; 2022 Aug; 23(1):165. PubMed ID: 35915475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Post-translational Regulation of Cas9 during G1 Enhances Homology-Directed Repair.
Gutschner T; Haemmerle M; Genovese G; Draetta GF; Chin L
Cell Rep; 2016 Feb; 14(6):1555-1566. PubMed ID: 26854237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A homology independent sequence replacement strategy in human cells using a CRISPR nuclease.
Danner E; Lebedin M; de la Rosa K; Kühn R
Open Biol; 2021 Jan; 11(1):200283. PubMed ID: 33499763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
