These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36881943)

  • 1. Selective spatial attention in lateralized multi-talker speech perception: EEG correlates and the role of age.
    Getzmann S; Schneider D; Wascher E
    Neurobiol Aging; 2023 Jun; 126():1-13. PubMed ID: 36881943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG correlates of spatial shifts of attention in a dynamic multi-talker speech perception scenario in younger and older adults.
    Getzmann S; Klatt LI; Schneider D; Begau A; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 398():108077. PubMed ID: 32987238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do congruent lip movements facilitate speech processing in a dynamic audiovisual multi-talker scenario? An ERP study with older and younger adults.
    Begau A; Klatt LI; Wascher E; Schneider D; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113436. PubMed ID: 34175355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain correlates of the orientation of auditory spatial attention onto speaker location in a "cocktail-party" situation.
    Lewald J; Hanenberg C; Getzmann S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1484-95. PubMed ID: 27333881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of speech processing units on auditory stream segregation and selective attention in a multi-talker (cocktail party) situation.
    Tóth B; Honbolygó F; Szalárdy O; Orosz G; Farkas D; Winkler I
    Cortex; 2020 Sep; 130():387-400. PubMed ID: 32750602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP correlates of auditory goal-directed behavior of younger and older adults in a dynamic speech perception task.
    Getzmann S; Falkenstein M; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():435-45. PubMed ID: 25447300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal and Directional Cue Effects on the Cocktail Party Problem for Patients With Listening Difficulties Without Clinical Hearing Loss.
    Kawase T; Teraoka R; Obuchi C; Sakamoto S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1740-1751. PubMed ID: 35671083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech prosody supports speaker selection and auditory stream segregation in a multi-talker situation.
    Kovács P; Tóth B; Honbolygó F; Szalárdy O; Kohári A; Mády K; Magyari L; Winkler I
    Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 1805():148246. PubMed ID: 36657631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Right Temporoparietal Junction Supports Speech Tracking During Selective Listening: Evidence from Concurrent EEG-fMRI.
    Puschmann S; Steinkamp S; Gillich I; Mirkovic B; Debener S; Thiel CM
    J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(47):11505-11516. PubMed ID: 29061698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral contrast effects are modulated by selective attention in "cocktail party" settings.
    Bosker HR; Sjerps MJ; Reinisch E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1318-1332. PubMed ID: 31338824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where is the cocktail party? Decoding locations of attended and unattended moving sound sources using EEG.
    Bednar A; Lalor EC
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 205():116283. PubMed ID: 31629828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using visual speech at the cocktail-party: CNV evidence for early speech extraction in younger and older adults.
    Begau A; Arnau S; Klatt LI; Wascher E; Getzmann S
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108636. PubMed ID: 36332379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.
    Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral hearing loss reduces the ability of children to direct selective attention during multi-talker listening.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():160-172. PubMed ID: 28505526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
    Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.