183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36882695)
1. Comparison of clinical safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection versus uterine artery embolization in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Du Z; Xu W; Lu J; Li C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Mar; 23(1):149. PubMed ID: 36882695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Long Y; Zhu H; Hu Y; Shen L; Fu J; Huang W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD011174. PubMed ID: 32609376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The novel use of lauromacrogol: A respective study of ultrasound-guided sclerosant injection for cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhu L; Gao J; Yang X; Qian L; Wang Y; Zhang H; Chen B; Li D
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Jan; 48(1):140-145. PubMed ID: 34755427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.
Liu Y; Wang L; Zhu X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):446-454. PubMed ID: 36893898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Assessment of Ultrasound-Guided Local Lauromacrogol Injection Combined With Curettage and Hysteroscopy for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Wu Q; Liu X; Zhu L; Zhu Y; Mei T; Cao S; Shen Y; Ding J; Lin T
Front Pharmacol; 2020; 11():601977. PubMed ID: 33408631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang X; Yang B; Chen W; Chen J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Feb; 23(1):85. PubMed ID: 36726079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy and safety between high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Mi W; Pei P; Zheng Y
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jun; 10(6):6379-6387. PubMed ID: 34237960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of different treatments for type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhou W; Feng X; Yu J; Chai Z; Zheng L; Qi F
Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):407-413. PubMed ID: 35691718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.
Xiao X; Feng Z; Li T; Yi B; Zhang S; Wang W
Adv Ther; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1314-1325. PubMed ID: 31049875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of efficacies between ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin and hysteroscopic electro-resection after methotrexate chemotherapy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Liu T; Xu X
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 42(7):3041-3047. PubMed ID: 35672873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical application and prognostic analysis of interventional treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy].
Lu JY; Gu JP; Xu WJ; Lou WS; Shi WY; Wang T; Shao ZF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Dec; 48(6):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 27987506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dilatation and Curettage after Uterine Artery Embolization versus Methotrexate Injection for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience.
Pecorino B; Scibilia G; Mignosa B; Teodoro MC; Chiofalo B; Scollo P
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Mar; 60(3):. PubMed ID: 38541213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine artery embolization with and without local methotrexate infusion for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Qi F; Zhou W; Wang MF; Chai ZY; Zheng LZ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 54(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 26384053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis.
Qiao B; Zhang Z; Li Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1040-1048. PubMed ID: 27553186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dilatation and curettage versus lesion resection in the treatment of cesarean-scar-pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li J; Li H; Jiang J; Zhang X; Shan S; Zhao X; Shi B
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):412-421. PubMed ID: 33966722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective comparative study evaluating the efficacy of adding intra-arterial methotrexate infusion to uterine artery embolisation followed by curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy.
Gao L; Hou YY; Sun F; Xia W; Yang Y; Tian T; Chen QF; Li XC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 29497822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Chen L; Xiao S; Zhu X; He S; Xue M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):883-890. PubMed ID: 30205163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.
Hong Y; Guo Q; Pu Y; Lu D; Hu M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7687. PubMed ID: 28746234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the necessity of uterine artery embolization during suction and curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.
Ou J; Peng P; Li C; Teng L; Liu X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jun; 20(1):378. PubMed ID: 32600442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Therapeutic effects of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and methotrexate (MTX) conservative therapy used in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Yang H; Li S; Ma Z; Jia Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 26386965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
