These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36882917)

  • 21. Neonate Auditory Brainstem Responses to CE-Chirp and CE-Chirp Octave Band Stimuli I: Versus Click and Tone Burst Stimuli.
    Cobb KM; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):710-723. PubMed ID: 27556529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts.
    Shore SE; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1286-95. PubMed ID: 3840500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory brain stem responses evoked by different chirps based on different delay models.
    Cebulla M; Elberling C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):452-60. PubMed ID: 20807481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
    de Boer J; Hardy A; Krumbholz K
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):787-802. PubMed ID: 35984541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode on electrocochleography in Hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Tejani VD; Carroll RL; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 384():107815. PubMed ID: 31678892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cochlear response telemetry: intracochlear electrocochleography via cochlear implant neural response telemetry pilot study results.
    Campbell L; Kaicer A; Briggs R; O'Leary S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 25473960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Panario J; Bester C; O'Leary S
    Ear Hear; 2024 Sep-Oct 01; 45(5):1173-1190. PubMed ID: 38816899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory brainstem response with click and CE-Chirp® Level Specific stimuli in hearing infants.
    Ormundo DDS; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 147():110819. PubMed ID: 34198155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochlear compound action potentials from high-level tone bursts originate from wide cochlear regions that are offset toward the most sensitive cochlear region.
    Lee C; Guinan JJ; Rutherford MA; Kaf WA; Kennedy KM; Buchman CA; Salt AN; Lichtenhan JT
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Mar; 121(3):1018-1033. PubMed ID: 30673362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of binaural auditory brainstem responses and the binaural difference potential evoked by chirps and clicks.
    Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):85-96. PubMed ID: 12121742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contralateral Inhibition of Click- and Chirp-Evoked Human Compound Action Potentials.
    Smith SB; Lichtenhan JT; Cone BK
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():189. PubMed ID: 28420960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.
    Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 40-Hz multiple auditory steady-state responses to narrow-band chirps in sedated and anaesthetized infants.
    Mühler R; Rahne T; Mentzel K; Verhey JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May; 78(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 24613039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Towards effective assessment of normal hearing function from ABR using a time-variant sweep-tone stimulus approach.
    Jiang Y; Samuel OW; Zhang H; Chen S; Li G
    Physiol Meas; 2021 May; 42(4):. PubMed ID: 33238252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic accuracy of CE Chirp.
    Biagio-de Jager L; van Dyk Z; Vinck BH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110071. PubMed ID: 32497908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.