These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36882917)
41. Diagnostic accuracy of CE Chirp. Biagio-de Jager L; van Dyk Z; Vinck BH Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110071. PubMed ID: 32497908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Further comparisons of ABR response amplitudes, test time, and estimation of hearing threshold using frequency-specific chirp and tone pip stimuli in newborns: Findings at 0.5 and 2 kHz. Ferm I; Lightfoot G Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):745-50. PubMed ID: 26121565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig. Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Electrophysiological properties of cochlear implantation in the gerbil using a flexible array. DeMason C; Choudhury B; Ahmad F; Fitzpatrick DC; Wang J; Buchman CA; Adunka OF Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 22436408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Electrocochleographic frequency-following responses as a potential marker of age-related cochlear neural degeneration. Temboury-Gutierrez M; Märcher-Rørsted J; Bille M; Yde J; Encina-Llamas G; Hjortkjær J; Dau T Hear Res; 2024 May; 446():109005. PubMed ID: 38598943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Transient and steady state auditory responses with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation. Verhaert N; Hofmann M; Wouters J Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 25401379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An improved method of obtaining electrocochleography recordings from Nucleus Hybrid cochlear implant users. Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ; Woo J Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():113-120. PubMed ID: 30665078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Measurements in Traditional and Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation. Nassiri AM; Yawn RJ; Gifford RH; Haynes DS; Roberts JB; Gilbane MS; Murfee J; Bennett ML J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(10):918-926. PubMed ID: 31274070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept. Lichtenhan JT; Cooper NP; Guinan JJ Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 22874644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of Pure-Tone Thresholds and Cochlear Microphonics Thresholds in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Patients. Coulthurst S; Nachman AJ; Murray MT; Koka K; Saoji AA Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1320-1326. PubMed ID: 32332587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients. Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children. Zirn S; Louza J; Reiman V; Wittlinger N; Hempel JM; Schuster M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Aug; 78(8):1352-5. PubMed ID: 24882456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds. Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Acoustic Change Complex Recorded in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users. Jeon EK; Mussoi BS; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(3):151-157. PubMed ID: 36450234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Auditory Electrophysiological Thresholds With Different Chirps and Their Correlation With Behavioral Thresholds in Hearing-Impaired Children. Leusin Mattiazzi Â; Cóser PL; Endruweit Battisti ID; Dalcin Pinto J; Pinto Vieira Biaggio E Ear Hear; 2024 Sep-Oct 01; 45(5):1228-1240. PubMed ID: 38797884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of Different Electrode Configurations on the Narrow Band Level-Specific CE-Chirp and Tone-Burst Auditory Brainstem Response at Multiple Intensity Levels and Frequencies in Subjects With Normal Hearing. Dzulkarnain AAA; Abdullah SA; Ruzai MAM; Ibrahim SHMN; Anuar NFA; Rahim 'EA Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):294-305. PubMed ID: 30054628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant. Harris MS; Riggs WJ; Koka K; Litvak LM; Malhotra P; Moberly AC; O'Connell BP; Holder J; Di Lella FA; Boccio CM; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e107-e113. PubMed ID: 28498269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring. Campbell AP; Suberman TA; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1391-8. PubMed ID: 20856155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quick Estimation of Minimum Hearing Levels Using a Binaural Multifrequency Stimulus Paradigm: Proof of Concept. Gargeshwari A; Krishnan A; Delgado RE Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1474-1483. PubMed ID: 38825740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A Computational Model of the Electrically or Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Hearing. Kipping D; Zhang Y; Nogueira W IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 Nov; 71(11):3192-3203. PubMed ID: 38843064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]