These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36883035)
1. The Intra-Manufacture Diameter Variability of Rotary Files and Their Corresponding Gutta-Percha Cones Using Laser Scan Micrometer. Mirmohammadi H; Sitarz M; Shemesh H Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(4):453-456. PubMed ID: 36883035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-manufacture Diameter Variability of Rotary Files and Their Corresponding Gutta-Percha Cones Using Laser Scan Micrometre. Mirmohammadi H; Sitarz M; Shemesh H Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(2):159-162. PubMed ID: 29707008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diameter and Taper Variability of Single-file Instrumentation Systems and Their Corresponding Gutta-percha Cones. Haupt F; Seidel M; Rizk M; Sydow HG; Wiegand A; Rödig T J Endod; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1436-1441. PubMed ID: 30078573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standardization of variable taper files and corresponding gutta-percha cones amongst manufacturers. Keith AM; Hinman SE; Dickens NE; Kim JJ; Scott RV; Osborne NH J Endod; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39393517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intramanufacturer diameter and taper variability of rotary instruments and their corresponding Gutta-percha cones. Chesler MB; Tordik PA; Imamura GM; Goodell GG J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):538-41. PubMed ID: 23522553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diameter and taper variability of gutta-percha cones adapted to TruNatomyTM and RotateTM rotary file systems. Martínez I; Lozano A; Sanz JL; Forner L; Llena C J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e17-e22. PubMed ID: 36755679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of consistency in the dimension of gutta-percha cones of ProTaper Next and WaveOne with their corresponding number files. Bajaj N; Monga P; Mahajan P Eur J Dent; 2017; 11(2):201-205. PubMed ID: 28729793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fitness of gutta-percha cones in curved root canals prepared with reciprocating files correlated with tug-back sensation. Yoon H; Baek SH; Kum KY; Kim HC; Moon YM; Fang DY; Lee W J Endod; 2015 Jan; 41(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 25447506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional variability of nonstandardized greater taper finger spreaders with matching gutta-percha points. Briseño Marroquín B; Wolter D; Willershausen-Zönnchen B Int Endod J; 2001 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11307377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Removing Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment. Özyürek T; Demiryürek EÖ J Endod; 2016 Apr; 42(4):646-9. PubMed ID: 26898565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Efficacy of Rotary, Reciprocating, and Combined Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatment Techniques in Removing a Carrier-Based Root Canal Filling Material from Straight Root Canal Systems: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis. Alakabani TF; Faus-Llácer V; Faus-Matoses I; Ruiz-Sánchez C; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Sauro S; Faus-Matoses V J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32630387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Manual and Rotary Gutta-percha Removal Techniques. Colaco AS; Pai VA J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1871-4. PubMed ID: 26364003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Efficacy of the WaveOne Reciprocating File System versus the ProTaper Retreatment System in Endodontic Retreatment of Two Different Obturating Techniques. Jorgensen B; Williamson A; Chu R; Qian F J Endod; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1011-1013. PubMed ID: 28416307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of Combined Use of Different Nickel-Titanium Files on Removing Root Canal Filling Materials. Yürüker S; Görduysus M; Küçükkaya S; Uzunoğlu E; Ilgın C; Gülen O; Tuncel B; Görduysus MÖ J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 26778268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An Das S; De Ida A; Das S; Nair V; Saha N; Chattopadhyay S J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(5):311-316. PubMed ID: 29386777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris from Curved Root Canal Filling Removal Using 5 Nickel-Titanium Systems. Çanakçi BC; Ustun Y; Er O; Genc Sen O J Endod; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1101-4. PubMed ID: 27179592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiency and apical extrusion of debris: a comparative ex vivo study of four retreatment techniques in severely curved root canals. Kaşıkçı Bilgi I; Köseler I; Güneri P; Hülsmann M; Çalışkan MK Int Endod J; 2017 Sep; 50(9):910-918. PubMed ID: 27706822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals. Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]