153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36883039)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars.
Aghazadeh S; Haghgoo R; Mehran M; Kadkhodaei F
Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(4):508-514. PubMed ID: 36883039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine and propolis as pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.
Kusum B; Rakesh K; Richa K
Restor Dent Endod; 2015 Nov; 40(4):276-85. PubMed ID: 26587413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial.
RojaRamya KS; Chandrasekhar R; Uloopi KS; Vinay C
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(Suppl 1):S3-S7. PubMed ID: 35645503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of Fresh
Kalra M; Garg N; Rallan M; Pathivada L; Yeluri R
Contemp Clin Dent; 2017; 8(1):106-111. PubMed ID: 28566860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Success of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Ferric Sulfate as Pulpotomy Medicaments for Primary Molars.
Cordell S; Kratunova E; Marion I; Alrayyes S; Alapati SB
J Dent Child (Chic); 2021 May; 88(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 34321144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth.
Agamy HA; Bakry NS; Mounir MM; Avery DR
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 15344622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars.
Farsi N; Alamoudi N; Balto K; Mushayt A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 29(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 16161395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth.
Srinivasan D; Jayanthi M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22048576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomy and Laser-Assisted Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomy: An Original Research Article.
Satyarth S; Alkhamis AM; Almunahi HF; Abdulaziz Alsuhaymi MO; Vadde HB; Senapathi SN; Shami AO; Aldrewesh RF; Nayyar AS
J Microsc Ultrastruct; 2021; 9(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 33850706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Hugar SM; Reddy R; Deshpande SD; Shigli A; Gokhale NS; Hugar SS
Contemp Clin Dent; 2017; 8(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 28566863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpotomy with MTA in Primary Molars: 30 Months Follow up.
Haghgoo R; Abbasi F
Iran Endod J; 2010; 5(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 23130045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evaluation of MTA and Biodentine as a pulpotomy materials for carious exposures in primary teeth.
Çelik BN; Mutluay MS; Arıkan V; Sarı Ş
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):661-666. PubMed ID: 29744721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and sodium hypochlorite pulpotomies: A prospective 24-month study.
Lin YT; Lin YJ
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Jun; 119(6):1080-1085. PubMed ID: 31635844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Pulpotomized Primary Molars Treated with Three Different Materials: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Biodentine, and Pulpotec. An In-vivo Study.
Mythraiye R; Rao VV; Minor Babu MS; Satyam M; R P; Paravada C
Cureus; 2019 Jun; 11(6):e4803. PubMed ID: 31404393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term treatment outcome of pulpotomies in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine: a randomized clinical trial.
Cuadros-Fernández C; Lorente Rodríguez AI; Sáez-Martínez S; García-Binimelis J; About I; Mercadé M
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1639-45. PubMed ID: 26578117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis.
Guo J; Zhang N; Cheng Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 36580161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report.
Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and comparison of white mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol medicaments in primary tooth pulpotomy: clinical and radiographic study.
Jayam C; Mitra M; Mishra J; Bhattacharya B; Jana B
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 24531596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth.
Aeinehchi M; Dadvand S; Fayazi S; Bayat-Movahed S
Int Endod J; 2007 Apr; 40(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 17309744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
