These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36883407)
1. Federalism's Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law. Hodge JG; Ghaith S; Krumholz L J Law Med Ethics; 2022; 50(4):848-851. PubMed ID: 36883407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and Reproductive Freedom: Constitutional and Practical Issues. Smith SR Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 66(2):312-322. PubMed ID: 37130376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights. Clark CS; Paluck EL; Westwood SJ; Sen M; Malhotra N; Jessee S Nat Hum Behav; 2024 Jan; 8(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 37945806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ahmed A; Evans DP; Jackson J; Meier BM; Tomori C J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 38088610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Two Front War on Reproductive Rights-When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can the Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions Be Far behind? Minkoff H; Vullikanti RU; Marshall MF Am J Bioeth; 2024 Feb; 24(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 37830758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting Health after Dobbs. Clark BR Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion. Macklin R Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The state of abortion rights in the US. Davis MF Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kulczycki A Health Educ Behav; 2022 Dec; 49(6):924-928. PubMed ID: 36173003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision. Buchbinder M; Mishtal J; Singer EO; Wendland CL Med Anthropol Q; 2022 Dec; 36(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36433774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds. Klassel D Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women's Health. Goodday S; Karlin D; Suver C; Friend S J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e41417. PubMed ID: 36264611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Paltrow LM; Harris LH; Marshall MF Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):3-15. PubMed ID: 35652910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2021-2022. Hodge JG; White EN; Freed R; Wells N J Law Med Ethics; 2022; 50(3):608-612. PubMed ID: 36398641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anti-abortion movement. Wilson K Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion law reform in Nepal. Upreti M Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Aug; 126(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 24890742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]