BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36883740)

  • 1. Quantum Informed Machine-Learning Potentials for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of CO
    Zheng B; Oliveira FL; Neumann Barros Ferreira R; Steiner M; Hamann H; Gu GX; Luan B
    ACS Nano; 2023 Mar; 17(6):5579-5587. PubMed ID: 36883740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine learning potential for modelling H
    Liu S; Dupuis R; Fan D; Benzaria S; Bonneau M; Bhatt P; Eddaoudi M; Maurin G
    Chem Sci; 2024 Apr; 15(14):5294-5302. PubMed ID: 38577379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining Machine Learning and Molecular Simulations to Unlock Gas Separation Potentials of MOF Membranes and MOF/Polymer MMMs.
    Daglar H; Keskin S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2022 Jul; 14(28):32134-32148. PubMed ID: 35818710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-Throughput Screening of the CoRE-MOF-2019 Database for CO
    Kancharlapalli S; Snurr RQ
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Jun; 15(23):28084-28092. PubMed ID: 37262369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Membrane-Based CO
    Daglar H; Keskin S
    J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces; 2018 Aug; 122(30):17347-17357. PubMed ID: 30093931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO
    Dokur D; Keskin S
    Ind Eng Chem Res; 2018 Feb; 57(6):2298-2309. PubMed ID: 29503503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating CH
    Gulbalkan HC; Uzun A; Keskin S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38082488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating Molecular Simulations with Machine Learning Guides in the Design and Synthesis of [BMIM][BF
    Daglar H; Gulbalkan HC; Habib N; Durak O; Uzun A; Keskin S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Apr; 15(13):17421-17431. PubMed ID: 36972354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do New MOFs Perform Better for CO
    Avci G; Erucar I; Keskin S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Sep; 12(37):41567-41579. PubMed ID: 32818375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eleven NanoHUB Simulation Tools Using RASPA Software To Demonstrate Classical Atomistic Simulations of Fluids and Nanoporous Materials.
    Umeh JC; Manz TA
    ACS Omega; 2022 Dec; 7(48):44470-44484. PubMed ID: 36506140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accelerating Metal-Organic Framework Selection for Type III Porous Liquids by Synergizing Machine Learning and Molecular Simulation.
    Sheng L; Wang Y; Mou X; Xu B; Chen Z
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Dec; 15(48):56253-56264. PubMed ID: 37988477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unlocking the Effect of H
    Erucar I; Keskin S
    Ind Eng Chem Res; 2020 Feb; 59(7):3141-3152. PubMed ID: 32201455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polarizable Force Field for CO
    Becker TM; Lin LC; Dubbeldam D; Vlugt TJH
    J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces; 2018 Oct; 122(42):24488-24498. PubMed ID: 30774742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of a Core-Shell Design Approach for Constructing MOFs for CO
    He Y; Boone P; Lieber AR; Tong Z; Das P; Hornbostel KM; Wilmer CE; Rosi NL
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 May; 15(19):23337-23342. PubMed ID: 37141279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating Flexibility Effects into Metal-Organic Framework Adsorption Simulations Using Different Models.
    Yu Z; Anstine DM; Boulfelfel SE; Gu C; Colina CM; Sholl DS
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2021 Dec; 13(51):61305-61315. PubMed ID: 34927436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thermo-, Electro-, and Photocatalytic CO
    Wu QJ; Liang J; Huang YB; Cao R
    Acc Chem Res; 2022 Oct; 55(20):2978-2997. PubMed ID: 36153952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adsorption and Diffusion Properties of Functionalized MOFs for CO
    Cai S; Yu L; Huo E; Ren Y; Liu X; Chen Y
    Langmuir; 2024 Apr; 40(13):6869-6877. PubMed ID: 38498690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep learning combined with IAST to screen thermodynamically feasible MOFs for adsorption-based separation of multiple binary mixtures.
    Anderson R; Gómez-Gualdrón DA
    J Chem Phys; 2021 Jun; 154(23):234102. PubMed ID: 34241255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational Investigation of Dual Filler-Incorporated Polymer Membranes for Efficient CO
    Aydin S; Altintas C; Erucar I; Keskin S
    Ind Eng Chem Res; 2023 Feb; 62(6):2924-2936. PubMed ID: 36812129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of MOF Performance in Vacuum Swing Adsorption Systems for Postcombustion CO
    Burns TD; Pai KN; Subraveti SG; Collins SP; Krykunov M; Rajendran A; Woo TK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(7):4536-4544. PubMed ID: 32091203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.