These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36884022)

  • 1. Hic Sunt Dracones: Molecular Docking in Uncharted Territories with Structures from AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAfold.
    Kersten C; Clower S; Barthels F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Apr; 63(7):2218-2225. PubMed ID: 36884022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Deep Learning Structural Models Sufficiently Accurate for Virtual Screening? Application of Docking Algorithms to AlphaFold2 Predicted Structures.
    Díaz-Rovira AM; Martín H; Beuming T; Díaz L; Guallar V; Ray SS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Mar; 63(6):1668-1674. PubMed ID: 36892986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of AlphaFold2 structures as docking targets.
    Holcomb M; Chang YT; Goodsell DS; Forli S
    Protein Sci; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e4530. PubMed ID: 36479776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide-protein docking.
    Tsaban T; Varga JK; Avraham O; Ben-Aharon Z; Khramushin A; Schueler-Furman O
    Nat Commun; 2022 Jan; 13(1):176. PubMed ID: 35013344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Obtaining protein foldability information from computational models of AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold.
    Liu S; Wu K; Chen C
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2022; 20():4481-4489. PubMed ID: 36051869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking AlphaFold-enabled molecular docking predictions for antibiotic discovery.
    Wong F; Krishnan A; Zheng EJ; Stärk H; Manson AL; Earl AM; Jaakkola T; Collins JJ
    Mol Syst Biol; 2022 Sep; 18(9):e11081. PubMed ID: 36065847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are predicted protein structures of any value for binding site prediction and virtual ligand screening?
    Skolnick J; Zhou H; Gao M
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2013 Apr; 23(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 23415854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein oligomer structure prediction using GALAXY in CASP14.
    Park T; Woo H; Yang J; Kwon S; Won J; Seok C
    Proteins; 2021 Dec; 89(12):1844-1851. PubMed ID: 34363243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of Docking-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands with Homology Modeled Structures: A Case Study of the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor.
    Chen H; Fu W; Wang Z; Wang X; Lei T; Zhu F; Li D; Chang S; Xu L; Hou T
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):677-689. PubMed ID: 30265513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11.
    Huwe PJ; Xu Q; Shapovalov MV; Modi V; Andrake MD; Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):370-91. PubMed ID: 27181425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates.
    Guterres H; Lee HS; Im W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Nov; 15(11):6524-6535. PubMed ID: 31557013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A benchmark testing ground for integrating homology modeling and protein docking.
    Bohnuud T; Luo L; Wodak SJ; Bonvin AM; Weng Z; Vajda S; Schueler-Furman O; Kozakov D
    Proteins; 2017 Jan; 85(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 27172383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein structure prediction provides comparable performance to crystallographic structures in docking-based virtual screening.
    Du H; Brender JR; Zhang J; Zhang Y
    Methods; 2015 Jan; 71():77-84. PubMed ID: 25220914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment.
    Lensink MF; Velankar S; Kryshtafovych A; Huang SY; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Sali A; Segura J; Fernandez-Fuentes N; Viswanath S; Elber R; Grudinin S; Popov P; Neveu E; Lee H; Baek M; Park S; Heo L; Rie Lee G; Seok C; Qin S; Zhou HX; Ritchie DW; Maigret B; Devignes MD; Ghoorah A; Torchala M; Chaleil RA; Bates PA; Ben-Zeev E; Eisenstein M; Negi SS; Weng Z; Vreven T; Pierce BG; Borrman TM; Yu J; Ochsenbein F; Guerois R; Vangone A; Rodrigues JP; van Zundert G; Nellen M; Xue L; Karaca E; Melquiond AS; Visscher K; Kastritis PL; Bonvin AM; Xu X; Qiu L; Yan C; Li J; Ma Z; Cheng J; Zou X; Shen Y; Peterson LX; Kim HR; Roy A; Han X; Esquivel-Rodriguez J; Kihara D; Yu X; Bruce NJ; Fuller JC; Wade RC; Anishchenko I; Kundrotas PJ; Vakser IA; Imai K; Yamada K; Oda T; Nakamura T; Tomii K; Pallara C; Romero-Durana M; Jiménez-García B; Moal IH; Férnandez-Recio J; Joung JY; Kim JY; Joo K; Lee J; Kozakov D; Vajda S; Mottarella S; Hall DR; Beglov D; Mamonov A; Xia B; Bohnuud T; Del Carpio CA; Ichiishi E; Marze N; Kuroda D; Roy Burman SS; Gray JJ; Chermak E; Cavallo L; Oliva R; Tovchigrechko A; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):323-48. PubMed ID: 27122118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
    Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benchmarking Refined and Unrefined AlphaFold2 Structures for Hit Discovery.
    Zhang Y; Vass M; Shi D; Abualrous E; Chambers JM; Chopra N; Higgs C; Kasavajhala K; Li H; Nandekar P; Sato H; Miller EB; Repasky MP; Jerome SV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Mar; 63(6):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 36897766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the CXCR4 structure on docking-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors.
    Planesas JM; Pérez-Nueno VI; Borrell JI; Teixidó J
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():123-36. PubMed ID: 23079643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.