135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36888843)
1. Could the radiographic image quality be affected by the excessive use of the photostimulable phosphor plate?
Ruiz DC; Gomes AF; Fontenele RC; Haiter Neto F; Freitas DQ; Groppo FC
Braz Dent J; 2023; 34(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 36888843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the deterioration of photostimulable phosphor plates.
Souza-Pinto GN; Santaella GM; Coli AA; Oenning AC; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190500. PubMed ID: 32302219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disinfection of intraoral photostimulable phosphor plates with 70% ethyl alcohol and 70% isopropyl alcohol alters image contrast and produces image artifacts.
Correia-Dantas IF; Ruiz DC; Fontenele RC; Freitas DQ; Farias-Gomes A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):741-752. PubMed ID: 37468380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor image plate artifacts and their prevalence.
Elkhateeb SM; Aloyouny AY; Omer MMS; Mansour SM
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 35097068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Does Ambient Light Affect the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography? A Quantitative Analysis Using Contemporary Digital Radiographic Systems.
Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Wanderley VA; Ambrosano GMB; Pauwels R; Oliveira ML
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Digital Enhancement Restore the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate-Based Radiographs Partially Damaged by Ambient Light?
Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Barros-Costa M; Oliveira ML
J Imaging Inform Med; 2024 Feb; 37(1):145-150. PubMed ID: 38343236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates.
Tashiro M; Nakatani A; Sugiura K; Nakayama E
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 35948784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of using a photostimulable phosphor plate protective device.
de Moura G; Vizzotto MB; Tiecher PFDS; Arús NA; Silveira HLDD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Sep; 50(6):20200339. PubMed ID: 33411592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the microstructure, chemical composition, and image quality of different PSP receptors.
Souza-Pinto GN; Nejaim Y; Gomes AF; Canteras FB; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e130. PubMed ID: 36383836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems.
Marinho-Vieira LE; Martins LAC; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 May; 51(4):20210404. PubMed ID: 34860568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of a wireless digital system and 2 PSP digital systems on proximal caries detection and pixel values.
dos Anjos Pontual A; de Melo DP; Pontual ML; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
Gen Dent; 2013; 61(6):56-60. PubMed ID: 24064165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of phosphor plate-based radiographic image specifications on fractal analysis of alveolar bone.
Oliveira-Santos N; Michels M; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Oct; 128(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 31324583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates: is there a safe limit for acceptable image quality?
Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Oct; 52(7):20230174. PubMed ID: 37493608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions: An in vitro study.
Ruiz DC; Farias-Gomes A; Fontenele RC; Gaêta-Araujo H; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Groppo FC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 135(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 36566136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hypochlorous acid and white vinegar: Artifact-free COVID-19 disinfection options for photostimulable storage phosphor plates.
Pamukcu U; Peker I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Sep; 134(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 35869016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging].
Li Y; Lin H; Zhang TJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 34650308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two digital intraoral radiography imaging systems as a function of contrast resolution and exposure time.
Aydin KC; Demirel O; Özcan M
Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Jun; 69(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 32610723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
