These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36890002)

  • 1. Effect of spatial arrangement and clinical service lifetime simulation on the retention of magnetic units used in implant-anchored orbital prostheses.
    Artopoulou II; Zinelis S; Lemon JC; Polyzois G; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):811.e1-811.e9. PubMed ID: 36890002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study.
    Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of sterilization on the retention properties of magnetic attachments for dental implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19832767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.
    Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):487.e1-487.e12. PubMed ID: 35934574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):738.e1-738.e6. PubMed ID: 32165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The change in retentive force of magnetic attachment by abrasion.
    Huang Y; Tawada Y; Hata Y; Watanabe F
    Odontology; 2008 Jul; 96(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 18661208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdenture attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16501313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces on the stability of 2-implant-retained mandibular overdenture.
    Liu W; Zhang X; Qing H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 31780109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.