These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3689174)

  • 1. Physical and aerodynamic features of the Bordeaux voice prosthesis.
    Jebria AB; Henry C; Petit J; Gioux M; Devars F; Traissac L
    Artif Organs; 1987 Oct; 11(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3689174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aerodynamic characteristics of Blom-Singer low-pressure voice prostheses.
    Smith BE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1986 Jan; 112(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 2934043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aerodynamic and sound intensity measurements in tracheoesophageal voice.
    Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tan FM; Tange RA; Schouwenburg PF
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 17127821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Staffieri tracheo-oesophageal prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy: an evaluation of characteristics.
    Belforte G; Carello M; Miani C; Staffieri A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 Nov; 36(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 10367468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
    Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis.
    Van den Hoogen FJ; Veenstra A; Verkerke GJ; Schutte HK; Manni JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Nov; 117(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 9442834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis.
    Hilgers FJ; Cornelissen MW; Balm AJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 250(7):375-8. PubMed ID: 8286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.
    Schwandt LQ; Tjong-Ayong HJ; van Weissenbruch R; der Mei HC; Albers FW
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 263(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 16421748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: aerodynamic properties.
    Chung RP; Geskus J; Mahieu HF
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10668359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox NID) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
    Hancock K; Houghton B; Van As-Brooks CJ; Coman W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 125(9):981-90. PubMed ID: 16109676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Nijdam voice prosthesis: a self-retaining valveless voice prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
    van den Hoogen FJ; Nijdam HF; Veenstra A; Manni JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Nov; 116(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 8973732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Airway resistances of Blom-Singer and Panje Low Pressure tracheoesophageal puncture prostheses.
    Weinberg B; Moon JB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 3702364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element--an experimental study and initial clinical results].
    Hagen R; Berning K; Korn M; Schön F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jun; 77(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 9701754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Downsizing of voice prosthesis diameter in patients with laryngectomy: an in vitro study.
    Eerenstein SE; Grolman W; Schouwenburg PF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Jul; 128(7):838-41. PubMed ID: 12117347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
    Hilgers FJ; Schouwenburg PF
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Nov; 100(11):1202-7. PubMed ID: 2233085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Groningen prosthesis.
    Manni JJ; van den Broek P; de Groot MA; Berends E
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Oct; 13(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 6544851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An apparatus to measure pressure, flow and speech parameters in patients producing speech using the Groningen valve prosthesis.
    Parker AJ; Stevens JC; Clegg RT
    J Laryngol Otol; 1992 Oct; 106(10):896-9. PubMed ID: 1474312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative voice after laryngectomy using a sound-producing voice prosthesis.
    van der Torn M; de Vries MP; Festen JM; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Mahieu HF
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 11210885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aerodynamics of esophageal voice production with and without a Groningen voice prosthesis.
    Schutte HK; Nieboer GJ
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 11901261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.