These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36892880)

  • 1. "Stay focused!": The role of inner speech in maintaining attention during a boring task.
    Nedergaard J; Skewes JC; Wallentin M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Apr; 49(4):451-464. PubMed ID: 36892880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simon Says-On the influence of stimulus arrangement, stimulus material and inner speech habits on the Simon effect.
    Gade M; Paelecke M; Rey-Mermet A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1349-1363. PubMed ID: 31750724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective visual attention to emotional pictures: Interactions of task-relevance and emotion are restricted to the late positive potential.
    Schindler S; Straube T
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13585. PubMed ID: 32306463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional modulation of external speech attribution in patients with hallucinations and delusions.
    Ilankovic LM; Allen PP; Engel R; Kambeitz J; Riedel M; Müller N; Hennig-Fast K
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):805-812. PubMed ID: 21241719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-Down Modulation of Early Visual Processing in V1: Dissociable Neurophysiological Effects of Spatial Attention, Attentional Load and Task-Relevance.
    Wolf MI; Bruchmann M; Pourtois G; Schindler S; Straube T
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 May; 32(10):2112-2128. PubMed ID: 34607356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing.
    Meng Z; Lan Z; Yan G; Marsh JE; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1892-1905. PubMed ID: 32437187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mind over body: Interfering with the inner voice is detrimental to endurance performance.
    Nedergaard JSK; Christensen MS; Wallentin M
    Psychol Sport Exerc; 2023 Sep; 68():102472. PubMed ID: 37665911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of object-based attention in pigeons (Columba livia) and hill mynas (Gracula religiosa) using a spatial cueing task.
    Fujii K; Ushitani T
    J Comp Psychol; 2020 Feb; 134(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 31318224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal and external attention in speech anxiety.
    Deiters DD; Stevens S; Hermann C; Gerlach AL
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2013 Jun; 44(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 23187114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-modulated Sensitivity to Vocal Pitch in the Dorsal Premotor Cortex during Multitalker Speech Recognition.
    Venezia JH; Herrera C; Whittle N; Leek MR; Barnes S; Holshouser B; Yi A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 34(11):2189-2214. PubMed ID: 36007073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orienting attention to visual or verbal/auditory imagery differentially impairs the processing of visual stimuli.
    Villena-González M; López V; Rodríguez E
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():71-78. PubMed ID: 26876471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disrupting the speech motor network: Exploring hemispheric specialization for verbal and manual sequencing using a dual-task approach.
    Hodgson JC; Tremlin R; Hudson JM
    Neuropsychology; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1101-1110. PubMed ID: 31448940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Error biases in inner and overt speech: evidence from tongue twisters.
    Corley M; Brocklehurst PH; Moat HS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):162-75. PubMed ID: 21244112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical activation patterns of affective speech processing depend on concurrent demands on the subvocal rehearsal system. A DC-potential study.
    Pihan H; Altenmüller E; Hertrich I; Ackermann H
    Brain; 2000 Nov; 123 ( Pt 11)():2338-49. PubMed ID: 11050033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparing for distraction: Attention is enhanced prior to the presentation of distractors.
    Makovski T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Feb; 148(2):221-236. PubMed ID: 30346200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crossmodal negativity bias in semantic processing.
    Gao C; Wedell DH; Shinkareva SV
    Emotion; 2022 Sep; 22(6):1270-1280. PubMed ID: 33211510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain 'talks over' boring quotes: top-down activation of voice-selective areas while listening to monotonous direct speech quotations.
    Yao B; Belin P; Scheepers C
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1832-42. PubMed ID: 22306805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sustaining attention for a prolonged period of time increases temporal variability in cortical responses.
    Reteig LC; van den Brink RL; Prinssen S; Cohen MX; Slagter HA
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():16-32. PubMed ID: 30925309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.