These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36892906)

  • 1. Age-related differences in the statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression.
    Lega C; Di Caro V; Strina V; Daini R
    Psychol Aging; 2023 May; 38(3):188-202. PubMed ID: 36892906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.
    Kim AJ; Senior J; Chu S; Mather M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1938-1959. PubMed ID: 38780565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations.
    Yu H; Allenmark F; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 May; 49(5):709-724. PubMed ID: 37261775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Donk M; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):443-457. PubMed ID: 35324244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
    Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical learning of target location and distractor location rely on different mechanisms during visual search.
    Zhou X; Hao Y; Xu S; Zhang Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):342-365. PubMed ID: 36513850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency.
    Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.
    Britton MK; Anderson BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 31886698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.